He is a de facto runner of the place. He is allowed to indulge in behavior unbecoming even to a pagan and get away with it.
Is the doctrine of Eternal Conscious Torment biblical or not?
- Thread starter Timotheos
- Start date
He is a de facto runner of the place. He is allowed to indulge in behavior unbecoming even to a pagan and get away with it.
:banana:
timmy, i hate to break this to you, but you are not intelligent
:banana::banana:
Ben Masada
New member
Sorry Hawkins, but... as much as I hate to rain on your parade, I think you are going to do without that wish thinking ID you claim we need as an individual.
Humans do not need a soul. They are souls. When the Lord formed man from the dust of the earth, He breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul. To become is to be and not to have. Therefore, we are souls. (Gen. 2:7)
Soul = person. The soul is composed of body with the breath of life. At death, the body goes back to the dust and the breath of life which can be embellished with the word spirit goes back to God Who gave it. In other words, soul, being the name for that composition becomes non-existent with the death of the body.
There is absolutely nothing immortal about man but death. Once dead, one will never return. (Job 10:21; II Samuel 12:23) Besides, according to the Genesis allegory of Creation, the reason why man was banished from the Garden of Eden was to prevent him from eating of the tree of life and live forever. It means that immortality was denial man as an attribute as it belongs to God only. What had a beginning must have an end. Only God is without a beginning and an end.
Whether I am intelligent or not isn't on topic.
The question is:
"Is the doctrine of Eternal Conscious Torment biblical or not?"
Does my intelligence affect the answer to that question? You overestimate my importance.
By the way, I have prove that this:
is not true.
You are quite a little troll aren't you?
Why? He contributes nothing and is an embarrassment to the Christian Community. Just ban him once and for all.
trust me on this one
you're not
of course it is
that was determined in the first couple pages of this retarded monstrosity of a thread
you are just to retarded to have noticed
That would be "too" .
Creepy little Sadist.
(Res, that's someone who enjoys watching others being tormented)
freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
ECT itself is insanity......
ECT itself is insanity......
Many disagree that such represents a 'God' who is infinite Love. ECT can be challenged on a variety of levels,...which also brings other elements and factors into the 'equation' of 'free will' and the potential destiny of souls.
ECT exposed here.
I have yet to see a reasonable, logical explanation and 'justification' for a 'God' detaining and imposing an eternal sentence of unending pain, suffering, torment (to no end whatsoever but perpetual punishment and agony). Such a proposition itself is insane.
pj
ECT itself is insanity......
Many disagree that such represents a 'God' who is infinite Love. ECT can be challenged on a variety of levels,...which also brings other elements and factors into the 'equation' of 'free will' and the potential destiny of souls.
ECT exposed here.
I have yet to see a reasonable, logical explanation and 'justification' for a 'God' detaining and imposing an eternal sentence of unending pain, suffering, torment (to no end whatsoever but perpetual punishment and agony). Such a proposition itself is insane.
pj
Sadistic Troll said:
No, I noticed.
The doctrine of ETC was found to be unBiblical in the 3rd post of this thread. The rest of the thread has been dedicated to people insulting me.
Blind donkey
That's because I really don't care what you think, so your insults don't mean anything. I continue because with every insult you prove what kind of person you are.
That serves my purpose.
My purpose is to expose the kind of person you are, keep it up! :thumb:
Resurrected Sadist's Sig Line said:
Resurrected said:
i·ro·ny
ˈīrənē,ˈiərnē/
noun
noun: irony
1. the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.