I'll make it very simple:
Well, complicated wasn't working out for you, so that's a good idea.
A big woman overpowers a scrawny guy and forces things on him.
Why do we not see these alleged effects of rape in such a scenario?
I already answered you: you haven't made the case. But it's very difficult (not impossible) for a woman to rape a man. It's more likely a man will be raped by another man.
The reason you don't use that is you'd have to concede that rape is mostly about something more than sex (by more I mean in addition to or even instead). It's difficult to sexualize a male on male rape for most heterosexuals and removing the male/female connection denies you the habit of sexualizing the act comfortably.
We see it with men being raped by other men, which happens in prison.
You're going to compare social environments and how people hold themselves there to life outside?
lain:
I'm betting if you were raped by some dude as you attempted to jog through a park you wouldn't just walk it off.
You make a woman raped commensurate to man-on-man rape, and it doesn't add up.
It does if the man being raped isn't homosexual. Supra.
That is why you all don't want to answer the question, because it sabotages the grand facade.
Not even a little true.
'Retreated in fear'-
Do you have a short term memory problem too? I said it would be assault as well IF she retreated in fear. Putting someone in fear of the unwanted contact is what assault is all about.
she wouldn't have been scared of anything, which is why she become psychotic in the first place.
Psychotic people don't tend to attempt to secure themselves from non psychotic people. You appear to have your facts backwards. Or maybe just your thinking.
But it is a slam dunk to claim it in court as soon as there is an admittance that he pushed the door.
If the door is closed he did more than push it, which explains why it struck her, likely leaving evidence for the investigating officer.
The only way a man avoids a domestic assault is if he was utterly passive.
Spoken like someone who literally doesn't know what he's talking about but insists on talking about it anyway.
I've seen the lunacy unfold, lawyers aren't th eonly one's with eyes and ears in a courtroom
It doesn't "unfold" in a courtroom. It is settled there.
That's funny, considering how untrue that is. Like I said- seen it go down more than once.
Well, with that chip on your shoulder and that degree of experience...
lain: I'd laugh, but reading your attempt to spin that into something like expertise or a rule is just...painful.
Now coup de disgrace yourself:
Yeah, and that's why I don't care if women like you get raped.
There's no excuse, no personal bias that should make anyone with half a soul make that statement.
Thanks for putting you in perspective for everyone. :thumb:
