I don't believe you have claimed that Jesus is God the Father, nor have I ever accused you of claiming that Jesus is God the Father, so, as usual, you're lying to me, and about me.
You're a waste of my patience. You litreally said to me in post 557, "Since, by the word "God", you mean "God the Father", here is what you are saying: "Nothing about the name implies Jesus was God the Father."
Now you're saying "I don't believe you have claimed that Jesus is God the Father, nor have I ever accused you of claiming that Jesus is God the Father"
So on one hand you say to me"by God you mean the Father" and then when I pull you up on it you say "I ever accused you of claiming that Jesus is God the Father"??? How are you making any logical sense buddy, you litreally told me that when I mentioned God in my statement I meant the Father, even though I didn't.
Here, you are admitting that the name, 'Emmanuel', means 'God with us', and not 'God the Father with us'. Thank you.
As I've already shown to you and as I've never denied, Emmanuel means 'God with us', the difference in our beliefs is how God was with his people. Again, you believe God was with his people in the body of Jesus, I believe God was with his people in the way of symbolic presence, it was a figure of speech. The same way one might say 'God is with us' when is a church it doesn't imply that God is literally there in body, rather he is there in way of presence or attention.
I've said this to you in the past, whatever is going on in that head of yours you may think you sound smart by the things you say but you don't, you sound bonkers. Get it together.