ICE agent shoots a driver.

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It's okay, JR. I understood ahead of time what you'd say when I didn't give your randos my time.

I do hope that you'll consider why he moved his phone from his right hand to his left when he did, which was before he could even claim there was a threat to him.

It's completely irrelevant, and you know it.

The moment she accelerated towards him, he became fully justified in shooting her.

You know that overhead shot is fake, right?

Leave it to you to focus on something completely irrelevant.

Try listening to what is said.

But you won't. Because it destroys the narrative you're peddling, and that's why no one cares what you think anymore, Anna.

You know that's fake, right?

And that's more of my time than they deserved.

Prove it. You won't. Because you can't. Because then your narrative that you hold oh so dearly to might be disproven.
 

Nick M

God and sinners reconciled
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame

Minnesota Statutory Law on Deadly Force (Minn. Stat. § 609.066)


Under Minnesota state law, deadly force by a peace officer is only legally justified when necessary to protect the officer or another person from death or great bodily harm — or in some limited cases to prevent the escape of a suspect reasonably believed to pose such a threat.

Deadly force against a vehicle may be allowed only when the officer or another person is being threatened with death or serious bodily harm — including a vehicle being used as a deadly weapon — and no reasonable alternative exists (like moving out of the vehicle’s path)

She accelerated directly at him as shown in his video. Case closed.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
On the morning of August 27, 2025, a mass shooting occurred at the Church of the Annunciation in the Windom neighborhood of Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.

What else does Minneapolis have to offer?

On August 26, the day before the Annunciation attack, another mass shooting occurred outside Cristo Rey Jesuit High School in Minneapolis, injuring six and killing one.

George Floyd May 25, 2020

Renee Nicole Good January 7, 2026

The 'learing' center is in Minneapolis
 
Last edited:

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It's important to know when things are fake. That image is fake. You may not think amplifying a fake image is relevant, but it is.

Saying it doesn't make it so!

Prediction: @annabenedetti will ignore every photo and camera angle that I have just posted showing how the shoot was justified, and continue to peddle the narrative she is pushing.

No one cares what you people think anymore, Anna, because you're irrational baboons repeating the narrative you've been fed because it tickles your emotions the right way.

Called it!

And let's not forget the fact that she drove her vehicle at an officer, which alone justifies him shooting her until the threat to his life (and potentially others' lives) has been neutralized.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Apparently the agent suffered internal bleeding following being struck, according to CBS News (3 independent confirmations).


You can continue to deny it all you want, @annabenedetti, but the shoot was completely justified.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Apparently the agent suffered internal bleeding following being struck, according to CBS News (3 independent confirmations).

And I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Totally unbelievable.

There are no "confirmations" of anything except these "independent confirmations are simply repeating what they were told by two unnamed officials. The administration lies on a daily basis. Who can believe antything they say now?
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
And I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Totally unbelievable.

There are no "confirmations" of anything except these "independent confirmations are simply repeating what they were told by two unnamed officials. The administration lies on a daily basis. Who can believe antything they say now?

You didn't watch the video, did you?

Shame, shame, shame.

This is why no one cares what you think anymore, Anna.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
And I've got a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Totally unbelievable.

There are no "confirmations" of anything except these "independent confirmations are simply repeating what they were told by two unnamed officials. The administration lies on a daily basis. Who can believe anything they say now?

CBS News is a hostile witness here to the government. They're a left-leaning broadcast network, yet they published an article confirming what the government said about the agent.

That lends tremendous credence to their story. They could have put the Trump administration on blast, calling them out for spreading misinformation. But they didn't. They reported that he was injured. How was he injured, if not by being struck by that woman?

You claim to be "balanced," or however you want to put it, yet people who are further left than where you claim to be are saying that the agent was injured and now suffers from internal bleeding.

You could argue that they're controlled by the government, of course, but that's conspiracy theory territory. Surely you're not a conspiracy theorist, are you?

If you want to call their story into question, that's fine, just realize that you look really stupid in doing so, and it ruins your already incredibly low credibility.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
CBS News is a hostile witness here to the government. They're a left-leaning broadcast network, yet they published an article confirming what the government said about the agent.

You may not know that CBS news is now a Trump-appeasing network, which is why they scrubbed the 60 Minutes CECOT piece.


The new owners of CBS News announced Monday that they have selected Kenneth R. Weinsteina Donald Trump supporter and right-wing think-tanker with no apparent newsroom experience who often criticizes the news media’s purported liberal bias — to scrutinize the network’s coverage as its ombudsman.
The position will allow Weinstein to serve as a conduit for the MAGA movement’s complaints about CBS News’ coverage and personnel, allowing Trumpist operatives and right-wing media to discipline the network’s journalists.​
David Ellison’s Skydance Media promised to appoint a CBS News ombudsman as part of the shakedownTrump and his administration put it through in order to secure its acquisition of CBS parent company Paramount. When Brendan Carr, the Trumpist head of the Federal Communications Commission, finally blessed the Skydance deal in July, he touted its pledge to “root out the bias” at CBS News.​
More here. Take your pick:



That lends tremendous credence to their story.

And now you know that no, it doesn't.

And since when do you ascribe "tremendous credence" to a source you'd normally deride and dismiss?

And now CBS lends tremendous credence? When they tell you what you want to hear?

I'm asking you to stop for a moment and think about that.

They could have put the Trump administration on blast, calling them out for spreading misinformation. But they didn't. They reported that he was injured. How was he injured, if not by being struck by that woman?

You claim to be "balanced," or however you want to put it, yet people who are further left than where you claim to be are saying that the agent was injured and now suffers from internal bleeding.

And they're not further left, are they? They won't be putting the Trump administration on blast or they wouldn't have killed the CECOT piece, among other things. They have a Trump loyalist as their ombudsman, telling them what's allowed. Follow the money.

You could argue that they're controlled by the government, of course, but that's conspiracy theory territory. Surely you're not a conspiracy theorist, are you?

Is this where you preemptively dismiss the above non-conspiratorial facts I just gave you about the current CBS trajectory? Does that mean you're already aware that today's CBS isn't your father's or grandfather's CBS?

If you want to call their story into question, that's fine, just realize that you look really stupid in doing so, and it ruins your already incredibly low credibility.

Your consideration of me isn't even remotely in my field of focus, JR. Surely you must realize that by now. All I'm interested in is hoping that one day you'll step outside X and YouTube for your information, and in the process understand those platforms for what they are.
 
Last edited:

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
You may not know that CBS news is now a Trump-appeasing network

Anything but just conceding that you're wrong, huh?

Fine.


"Mostly factual."

Meaning they're probably not lying about the agent suffering internal bleeding.

which is why they scrubbed the 60 Minutes CECOT piece.

Perhaps because it wasn't factual?

Having someone who likes Trump doesn't make them controlled by the government.

"Follow the money"

Puh-lease...

So you're a conspiracy theorist now?

Oh brother.

Like I said. You have no credibility here anymore. Just TDS.

"Trump bad, therefore everything associated with him must be wrong or false in favor of the narrative I believe!
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Anything but just conceding that you're wrong, huh?

Fine.

I return the sentiment.


"Mostly factual."

Meaning they're probably not lying about the agent suffering internal bleeding.

Good for you, using Media Bias Fact Check! I mean that!

So did you notice they rated CBS as having a right/center bias? You said earlier CBS was "left-leaning." Have you reconsidered?

Also at your link:

  • Overall, we rate CBS News as Right-Center Biased in this update due to emerging editorial decisions and leadership influence under Bari Weiss that suggest a shift away from its historically left-center orientation. Due to emerging evidence that CBS News is censoring content unfavorable to the government, we are downgrading its rating to Mostly Factual with Medium credibility, despite its historically strong sourcing, professional reporting, and lack of significant failed fact checks.


I understand if you didn't want to believe me in my previous post, but do you believe me now that your link has backed me up?

Perhaps because it wasn't factual?

Factual when you think they've provided evidence of internal bleeding (they haven't) and not factual when reporting on CECOT?

Having someone who likes Trump doesn't make them controlled by the government.

Trump loyalists are loyal for a reason. They obey and he rewards, and if they disobey he gets revenge - whether it's people, party, institution, corporation, country. Ask any Republican about their fear of being primaried, a university about bowing down to keep their funding, countries about appeasing him to maintain diplomatic balance, and so on.

"Follow the money"

Yep. CBS putting their acquisition of Paramount over their journalistic integrity.

Puh-lease...

So you're a conspiracy theorist now?

Called it!
 
Last edited:
Top