I know you mean well, but you don't bring glory to God, and you make Him seem weak in comparison when you render God incapable of reacting to situations. God is a capable God. He can react to man's resistance of Him.
If man has free will, then man can love God freely, or man can hate God freely.
If man does NOT have free will, then man cannot love God, because he does not have the option to hate Him. We would be organic robots just following instructions, emotions would mean nothing at all, and we would not be able to form a relationship with our creator.
Say a man loves a woman, and builds her a home and puts her in it, and then removes all the doors and windows on the outside of the house, and then tells her to stay with him, so that she will love him. What is the woman's response? She will despise him. She will not love him, because she is being forced to stay with him. She has no choice. She will be unable to love him, and that house becomes a living Hell for her.
But what about a man who loves a woman, and builds her a house, and brings her to it, but says that if she wants to leave, there's the door? Now she is presented with a choice: this man loves her enough to say that if she wants to leave, he's not going to keep her there, but if she chooses to love him in return, he has provided her with a house to live in. she now has the option to either love him or hate him.
Which man do you think represents God, the one who forces people to do things, who does not give people the option to love or hate Him, or the man who lets the person choose to love Him? Which kind of "love" means more to God?