"What in God's name have you done?"
Unfair, unless and only unless you think the subjects (the "teachers") of the Milgram experiments were also "feckless."Are they testifying? No?
Then you'll have to rely on them to place greater importance on the congressional oath they've already taken than the rest of the feckless GOP
There's no 'smoking gun' that I'm aware of from the former President Trump. But in the context of what Mr. Eastman appears to have been attempting in the "J6" rhetorical narrative explanation of events, former Trump's phone call is clearly serving the same function as the "experimenter's" in Milgram's experiments.and the ex-president did.
Our view is that Utilitarianism and Absolute Majoritarianism and Anarchism (along with Monarchism; and by extension any Autocracy) combined with Legal Positivism (that by their very nature, legitimate laws bind our hearts along with our minds and bodies; rather than there being a pre-political morality, against which our laws can be compared and contrasted; basically Legal Positivism is the empire of law, so whoever makes the laws are the emperors, but the law itself is absolute here and not any humans) are repugnant to [the regime of] the Constitution."I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
We don't want the Supreme Court expanded to 538 justices, do we?
Maybe we do. Maybe nine is like history's next biggest joke on modern Americans, after slavery and the Civil War.