Feminism
- Thread starter The 5 solas
- Start date
- Status
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Only to offset feminist agendas and feminist candidates.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Why don't you refrain from voting if you don't believe women should have been given the right to vote?
Why not let your husband do the offsetting?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Ah, that is by far the nicest compliment you have ever given me.
In my case, certainly. I DO pay my mortgage, insurance, utilities, etc. I don't need a man to draw out a picture or give a command to be able to function on a daily basis.
:duh:
Ah, you must have me confused for yourself. I only rule over ME, and have no desire to control you. That you wish to be ruled over is not my issue or concern. Frankly, I don't care what you do.
Oddly enough, many of your own don't consider you as "speaking for Him" so I guess we are in the same boat, eh?
As delightful as ever ...
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Two Christian votes better offset one devilish vote.
So feminism is helpful to you when it suits your wish to exercise the rights it affords you?
Two Christian votes better offset one devilish vote.
But Nang ... many don't consider you to be a Christian. So now, according to your own standards, you have two reasons as to why you should refrain from voting.
Opinions, opinions.
Nah, only a hypocrite would be against feminism and still reserve the right to vote.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Voting against you is the result of your devilish doings.
I would be perfectly happy to not HAVE to vote, just to oppose your ilk.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Your conscience tells you that women shouldn't vote, yet you vote anyway.
Duly noted, thanks.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
I guess that adds up to one . . . You.
So we are even. A non-Christian versus a non-Feminist.
The only difference is, your beliefs are ungodly and devilish, and mine are Godly and scriptural.
:carryon:
Ah, you need to blame others for doing something you believe should not be an option. How very responsible of you.
Why do you vote at all since the outcome will happen irregardless. Isn't that what you believe? :think:
Not have to? Someone makes you? They drag you kicking and screaming to the booths, eh?
Typical ... you hypocritically bash other women for utilizing a right that you use yourself.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Only if you don't understand what the word *many* means ... :chuckle:
One, many actual CHRISTIANS on this forum disagree with you.
Two, Godly and scriptural beliefs should speak for themselves in a person's disposition. Your unpleasant, hostile disposition do not line up with Godly or scriptural.
As usual, thanks for adding so much to this topic.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Voting against feminists has become a duty, that was imposed on me by feminists.
The little devils insisted voting "rights" upon women who did not approve or want to begin with.
The 5 solas
New member
I got busy with some work and came back to this....awesome! I was hoping we could get this party started, as it were.
Yes, there sure are..lots of variations out there. That is why it needs to be discussed because one label does not fit all on this subject.
I never said healthy feminism, I said secular concept of feminism...which to me is one that is ungodly.
I do not think anyone should stay in an abusive relationship. This is not what God intended a marriage should be.
The ideal is of course, a godly man married to a godly woman, who are putting Christ first in their lives. In this God is glorified and the woman is cherished, protected and honoured. If I said that to a secular feminist, I am sure she would have words for me.
This is true, that is often the response, but the reason for it is that is the strongest representation out there...or should I say the loudest and most vocal.
I do not know your personal situation, Rusha. I am thinking that you are single with what this statement says...correct me if I am wrong. If you are not single he should be paying too! lol
I agree that women do not NEED men to be able to do these things, women are very capable, equally capable and in some case more capable then some men. However, the ideal situation, for those who are called to marriage....is for them to function within their roles. Please understand, I am not saying that the woman is not participating in the functioning of the household with regards to bill payments, etc. Often, it is better when the woman has those administrative jobs to deal with, because then they always get done! lol
I think this statement has to bring into account my initial comments in this post.......feminism definitions vary hugely. I am not a feminist, but I do vote because I believe it to be my responsibility as a Canadian Citizen, etc. and I am legally able to vote. If I did not have the right to vote, I honestly would not be up in arms over it. I believe God is sovereign in all things, but that is another thread subject.
Yes, there sure are..lots of variations out there. That is why it needs to be discussed because one label does not fit all on this subject.
I never said healthy feminism, I said secular concept of feminism...which to me is one that is ungodly.
I do not think anyone should stay in an abusive relationship. This is not what God intended a marriage should be.
The ideal is of course, a godly man married to a godly woman, who are putting Christ first in their lives. In this God is glorified and the woman is cherished, protected and honoured. If I said that to a secular feminist, I am sure she would have words for me.
This is true, that is often the response, but the reason for it is that is the strongest representation out there...or should I say the loudest and most vocal.
I do not know your personal situation, Rusha. I am thinking that you are single with what this statement says...correct me if I am wrong. If you are not single he should be paying too! lol
I agree that women do not NEED men to be able to do these things, women are very capable, equally capable and in some case more capable then some men. However, the ideal situation, for those who are called to marriage....is for them to function within their roles. Please understand, I am not saying that the woman is not participating in the functioning of the household with regards to bill payments, etc. Often, it is better when the woman has those administrative jobs to deal with, because then they always get done! lol
I think this statement has to bring into account my initial comments in this post.......feminism definitions vary hugely. I am not a feminist, but I do vote because I believe it to be my responsibility as a Canadian Citizen, etc. and I am legally able to vote. If I did not have the right to vote, I honestly would not be up in arms over it. I believe God is sovereign in all things, but that is another thread subject.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
- Status