End of Roe Vs Wade?

Idolater

"Never believe anyone who is not cross-examined."
Dershowitz is not a born-again Christian and his involvement with Epstein and support for genocidal abortionists proves he is out of touch with God.
But he's still in touch with the rules of evidence and procedure used in law courts. Those rules promote and defend justice. God loves justice.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
But he's still in touch with the rules of evidence and procedure used in law courts. Those rules promote and defend justice. God loves justice.

Sure, "Dershowitz is in touch with the rules of evidence and procedure used in law courts," but if you know anything about Dershowitz's career, you know that he never met a criminal he didn't like. He uses his expertise to deny justice at every turn, including getting many murderers off the hook, including OJ Simpson. It's a sure bet that if you are reduced to having Alen Dershowitz defend you, it can only be because you're guilty. And the only reason he defends Trump is because he knows Trump is guilty.
 

marke

Well-known member
But he's still in touch with the rules of evidence and procedure used in law courts. Those rules promote and defend justice. God loves justice.
Democrats have suspended due process and defendant's rights in order to unjustly jail opponents of democrat voter fraud.
 

Rusha

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Sure, "Dershowitz is in touch with the rules of evidence and procedure used in law courts," but if you know anything about Dershowitz's career, you know that he never met a criminal he didn't like. He uses his expertise to deny justice at every turn, including getting many murderers off the hook, including OJ Simpson. It's a sure bet that if you are reduced to having Alen Dershowitz defend you, it can only be because you're guilty. And the only reason he defends Trump is because he knows Trump is guilty.

Now now, everyone knows that OJ was every bit as innocent as trump.
 

marke

Well-known member
Now now, everyone knows that OJ was every bit as innocent as trump.
The difference between the two is seen in Mueller's failure to find any real dirt on Trump and prosecutors being overwhelmed with mountains of incriminating evidence against O.J.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
I figured that since you're the one who's "pro-life" you would do it. Was I wrong?

I figured since you're the one who keeps bringing the subject up, that you would be willing to lead the adoption spree. Was I wrong? Or is there something preventing you from adopting as many kids as you can?
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
I figured since you're the one who keeps bringing the subject up, that you would be willing to lead the adoption spree. Was I wrong?
Yes, you were wrong. And apparently, so was I, about you.

These anti-choice women at an abortion protest rally were carrying signs that read, "Choose Adoption." This guy thought to ask, and as you might have guessed, not a single one of them had ever adopted a single child:

 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Yes, you were wrong. And apparently, so was I, about you.

These anti-choice women at an abortion protest rally were carrying signs that read, "Choose Adoption." This guy thought to ask, and as you might have guessed, not a single one of them had ever adopted a single child:


So why haven't you adopted one yet, User Name? Surely you would be at the front of the line to adopt as many children as you could! What better way to show up those evil "anti-choice women"!
 

marke

Well-known member
Yes, you were wrong. And apparently, so was I, about you.

These anti-choice women at an abortion protest rally were carrying signs that read, "Choose Adoption." This guy thought to ask, and as you might have guessed, not a single one of them had ever adopted a single child:

Do leftists adopt babies or are they just in favor of killing them in the womb so they will not have to deal with them?
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
What is the implied message here, that Americans are failing kids by not murdering them in the womb to spare them the risk of being put in foster homes?
The message that is being sent here is that you are a hypocrite.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
The message that is being sent here is that you are a hypocrite.

Says the hypocrite who hasn't adopted a single baby.


This is what happens when society normalizes the murder of millions of innocent children... our ongoing medical progress becomes stunted or starts to revert.

Had we not started killing innocent babies in the womb, women such as her would not have to suffer.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
It isn't hypocrisy for me to tell you that if "pro-lifers" don't get their adoption game going in full swing,

It IS hypocrisy for you to demand others to adopt when you haven't adopted any children yourself.

this could end up being disastrous.

It's already a disaster, with all the babies that have been slaughtered instead of adopted.

It's already a disaster, with how difficult it is to adopt!
 
Top