End of Roe Vs Wade?

marke

Well-known member

Seeking To Clarify Post-Roe Landscape, Sen. Scott Asks, “When Do You Believe Life Begins?”​


U.S. Sen. Rick Scott took on the pro-abortion activists clamoring about the seemingly pending doom of Roe v. Wade. Scott appeared to take a page from the book of the “What is a woman?” activists challenging gender ideology.

Writing in The Wall Street Journal earlier this week, Scott asked of Democrats, “When do you believe life begins?”

The Florida Republican noted that the GOP position on abortion is that life begins at conception, a conclusion” grounded in faith and values, but also in science.”

While Democrats and other pro-abortion activists recently have claimed that as many as two-thirds of Americans want Roe to remain intact, Scott countered that other polls show 73 percent of voters “agree that an unborn baby is a human being.”

“So that raises the question: When do Democrats believe life begins? At conception? At viability? At birth? After birth?” Scott asked.

The answer: “They won’t say.”

“Even more disconcerting,” the senator added, “reporters won’t ask them.”

“It’s a dereliction of duty by the mainstream media not to push the question, and it’s an abdication of their responsibility to inform the American people and spur legitimate debate,” Scott continued. “Democrats have come out as the abortion extremists we’ve always known they are. They’ve staked out a position that is simply outside the mainstream of where average American voters are.”

That position includes advocating for the protection of legalized abortion up until after the “moment of birth,” Scott wrote.


The devil's crowd will fight like hell to preserve the barbaric murder of children and they will fight like hell to protect laws condemning the display of educational materials that show what an aborted baby looks like before and after the abortion. Leftist devils also refuse to define the terms "woman," "baby," "human," or "viability."
 

Idolater

"Lahey, I live in a tent!"
Gird up thy loins
They're girded up. They've been girded up for this, for quite a while. Now is the time to strike, rhetorically. Whatever your best rhetorical stuff is we're going to need and use it, right now. The iron is hot. We have no control over when the iron is hot, and it is hot right now.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
IMG_20220516_092341.jpg


The only reason it is a gut-wrenching decision is because it's the murder of a child. A human child.

Polis knows that it's a human child. He knows that it's the murder of a human child. He knows it in his gut. He knows it because God is convicting him even as he is defying God.

Pray for his black soul.
 

marke

Well-known member
View attachment 3343


The only reason it is a gut-wrenching decision is because it's the murder of a child. A human child.

Polis knows that it's a human child. He knows that it's the murder of a human child. He knows it in his gut. He knows it because God is convicting him even as he is defying God.

Pray for his black soul.
Lefties have no respect for human life nor for honorable justices on the SCOTUS.

1652712953268.jpeg
 

Idolater

"Lahey, I live in a tent!"
... The only reason it is a gut-wrenching decision is because it's the murder of a child. A human child.

Polis knows that it's a human child. He knows that it's the murder of a human child. He knows it in his gut. ...
Yeah, basically.
He knows it because God is convicting him even as he is defying God.
Is God's law written in his heart? Does God convict unbelievers of sin? Or is the governor a Christian?
Pray for his black soul.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Here's A Complete List Of The Differences Between Abortion And Murder
👍


It reminds me of a politically incorrect joke of thinnest book titles, the only one of which I can remember is "Negroes I Have Met While Yachting" 😁
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I used to enjoy doing the exact same thing with the extreme feminists on Facebook. Very rarely I would get one who would admit that they would allow for the murder of the post birth child.

Screenshot_20220518-193251.png


 

marke

Well-known member
I used to enjoy doing the exact same thing with the extreme feminists on Facebook. Very rarely I would get one who would admit that they would allow for the murder of the post birth child.

View attachment 3405


I heard another woman say the mother has a right to her own body, even in the case of deciding whether to kill her toddler or not. That is how badly deceived the unsaved abortion supporters are.
1652954515113.jpeg
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

Biden DHS preparing for violence as activists threaten to burn down Supreme Court, murder justices: Reports​


Fence erected around the U.S. Supreme Court Feb. 5, 2021.

President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security is preparing for violence to erupt after the Supreme Court issues its anticipated ruling to overturn Roe v. Wade, a department memo obtained by Axios revealed Wednesday. The DHS’s concerns stem from a number of social-media threats to murder the justices and their clerks, burn down the Supreme Court building, and target places of worship.
According to Axios, the unclassified memo from the department’s intelligence wing stated that threats of violence – which first began after the Supreme Court’s draft opinion on the matter was leaked – “are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the Court’s official ruling.”


 

Idolater

"Lahey, I live in a tent!"
The good news is that in spite of radical members of his party calling to expand the Supreme Court, the president has said he wouldn't support that bill. So even if the radical Democratic House passes a bill, we've got a filibustering Senate plus the president who won't let it become law.

It's not like he's promoting a Constitutional amendment to codify nine justices, but it's not nothing. He's discouraged Democrats from pursuing this attempt to move the goalposts. That's good, since expanding the Court is something that Stalin would have thought to do, and would be one step closer to a single-party state, like they have in China.

Typical Democrats; unfortunately.
 

marke

Well-known member
The good news is that in spite of radical members of his party calling to expand the Supreme Court, the president has said he wouldn't support that bill. So even if the radical Democratic House passes a bill, we've got a filibustering Senate plus the president who won't let it become law.

It's not like he's promoting a Constitutional amendment to codify nine justices, but it's not nothing. He's discouraged Democrats from pursuing this attempt to move the goalposts. That's good, since expanding the Court is something that Stalin would have thought to do, and would be one step closer to a single-party state, like they have in China.

Typical Democrats; unfortunately.
Biden does not support every destructive leftist idea that bubbles up from hell below, but he supports enough of the nonsense to make him one of the worst presidents in US history., not even worthy to be called a legitimately-elected president.

1652985024915.jpeg
 

marke

Well-known member
The reason democrat presidents want to expand the courts is because existing justices tend to disallow their radical unconstitutional ideas and agendas. That was verbalized by FDR who wanted to appoint more liberal justices who would rubber-stamp his Marxist ideas without having to go through the process of changing the Constitution. Biden and pals have the same desire and goal. These democrat socialists and Marxists are not friends of God Bless America or godly laws and values.

Why Did FDR Want More Justices? A Summary of His Court Packing Plan.​

Written by Teach and Thrive in U.S. History Reading Passages

FDR court packing plan main

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THIS ARTICLE
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was elected to deal with the Great Depression. Much to his frustration, the Supreme Court kept on blocking his attempts to do so by finding his new programs unconstitutional. Changing the Constitution would take too long. Why not try to change the membership of the Supreme Court itself? The idea: any justice over seventy either retires or a new justice would be appointed. This “court packing plan” did not work. Still, FDR “lost the battle, but won the war.”
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
When I used to troll the hardcore feminist group on Facebook I would lead them to the inevitable conclusion that their arguments took them which was infanticide. Usually they would disengage. Often I would get a temporary ban. Very seldom I would get somebody who would agree.

Here's a video of people like them.

 
Top