ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Because they fear they will lose the ability to censor right wing thoughtThe question remains: Why is the left so afraid of Musk?
Because they fear they will lose the ability to censor right wing thoughtThe question remains: Why is the left so afraid of Musk?
What is your definition of free speech?“Twitter works because it has limits, terms of service, rules. A ‘free speech’ board where anything goes will immediately be infested by spam, scams, racism, Nazis, trolls with nothing else to do, and hate speech,” conspiracy theory and QAnon expert Mike Rothschild tweeted.
Analysts warn that making Twitter a free speech free-for-all could harm its business. They say if there was no buffering of hateful, offensive or extremist posts, individual users would be less likely to use Twitter.
Advertisers and publishers, concerned about their messages being paired with problematic posts, also want content standards even if that means the platform has fewer users and is less popular, said GroupM analyst Brian Wieser.
“We think that free speech absolutism on Twitter and Musk’s preferences would likely lead to a worse business, and worse platform for advertising for large brands even if Musk were otherwise able to find ways to grow usage or users on the platform,” Wieser wrote in a blog post.
Twitter under Elon Musk: What Twitter would look like if Tesla and SpaceX billionaire CEO was running it
Musk says he wants to take over Twitter. So what would change under Musk? Will he open the free speech floodgates? Reinstate Donald Trump? Ban ads?www.usatoday.com
What is your definition of free speech?
Regarding political free speech, what do you think of this definition:United States free speech exceptions - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Vague to the point of being utterly meaningless.Regarding political free speech, what do you think of this definition:
The freedom for someone I don't like to say something I don't like.
What's so vague about it? For example?Vague to the point of being utterly meaningless.
Everything is vague about it. It doesn't give any specifics.What's so vague about it? For example?
With that definition, what basis would I have for censoring anything political that you wanted to say?Everything is vague about it. It doesn't give any specifics.
You know as well as I do that it doesn't stop there.With that definition, what basis would I have for censoring anything political that you wanted to say?
They don't want the truth to come out.The question remains: Why is the left so afraid of Musk?
What truth? Let it come out here.They don't want the truth to come out.
Just as TOL enables members to put people on "ignore" Twitter can install the same feature. That way no delicate liberal snowflake will ever have to read a single tweet that might make him cry.You know as well as I do that it doesn't stop there.
@The Barbarian was permabanned from this forum to censor him from saying anything political.
Oh sure. Why didn't the offended parties here just put @The Barbarian on ignore?Just as TOL enables members to put people on "ignore" Twitter can install the same feature. That way no delicate liberal snowflake will ever have to read a single tweet that might make him cry.
Wouldn't that be wonderful UN?
Was that a yes or a no?Oh sure. Why didn't the offended parties here just put @The Barbarian on ignore?
People here like double standards, but only when they work in their favor.
An ignore feature would do nothing to protect the delicate conservative snowflakes who would neglect to use it, just as they do here.Was that a yes or a no?
Just as TOL enables members to put people on "ignore" Twitter can install the same feature. That way no delicate liberal snowflake will ever have to read a single tweet that might make him cry.
Wouldn't that be wonderful UN?
Those who refuse to simply use the ignore feature on Twitter will have their complaints ignored by the moderators.An ignore feature would do nothing to protect the delicate conservative snowflakes who would neglect to use it, just as they do here.
Let's do that here, shall we? See how it works out.Those who refuse to simply use the ignore feature on Twitter will have their complaints ignored by the moderators.
Their attempts to censor people they disagree with will fail. Wouldn't that be wonderful UN?
Does the thought of doing it on Twitter, (resulting in the likes of Donald Trump and Alex Jones using the Twitter megaphone again) give you nightmares?Let's do that here, shall we? See how it works out.
I have never Twittered, but when I was lurking on the radical feminist group on Facebook a couple of years ago I would put people on block as soon as they identified themselves as being either obnoxious or retarded. By the time I was banned I think I had over a hundred people on blockThose who refuse to simply use the ignore feature on Twitter will have their complaints ignored by the moderators.
Their attempts to censor people they disagree with will fail. Wouldn't that be wonderful UN?