Well, let's take a look...
The fig-wasp mutualism originated between 70 and 90 million years ago as the product of a unique evolutionary event. Since then, cocladogenesis and coadaptation on a coarse scale between wasp genera and fig sections has been supported by both morphological and molecular studies. This illustrates the tendency towards coradiation of figs and wasps. Such strict cospeciation should result in identical phylogenetic trees for the two lineages and recent work mapping fig sections onto molecular phylogenies of wasp genera and performing statistical comparisons has provided strong evidence for cospeciation at that scale.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fig_wasp
Surprise.
That was just a story.
If you know of a species of mosquito alive today, that existed back then, tell us about it. That would be remarkable.
"The Velociraptor lived in the late Cretaceous Period, about 75-70 million years ago."
https://www.google.com/search?q=whe...la:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
The oldest known mosquito with an anatomy similar to modern species was found in 79-million-year-old Canadian amber from the Cretaceous.[85] An older sister species with more primitive features was found in Burmese amber that is 90 to 100 million years old.[86] Two mosquito fossils have been found that show very little morphological change in modern mosquitoes against their counterpart from 46 million years ago.[87]
https://www.google.com/search?q=whe...la:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb
Tah Dah.
Modern Looking Species of Mosquitoes Existed, Before Some Dinosaurs; and
they had Fully Functional Mosquito Anatomy.
Not some half Evolved Mosquito Anatomy, that was Mutating it's way into Existence.
There you have it, Proved you wrong again
with your own Evol information, wikidpedia and all. LOL!!!
I honestly don't believe that the Dating Methods are Correct, but I find it funny that the Information that is considered to you to be truth says the Opposite of your own beliefs.
Evolution, is Not real; Which is Obvious when considering the Fig Wasp, or the Fact that Modern Mosquitoes Lived during the Same Period that the Raptor Lived, which evolutionists believed changed into a Turkey over a Hundred million years, but the Fossil record doesn't have any proof that they changed into Birds. So
if there is no evidence that Dinosaurs Evolved into Birds and you believe also that a Mosquito or A Dragonfly Contained the Same Anatomical Features for Hundreds of Millions of Years; Then how could you also believe that an Ape turned into a Woman in 3.5 Million Years?
=M=
:sam:
Anyway;
The fact that many modern animals can be found in the Same Fossil layers as the Dinosaurs proves that Modern animals Lived with Dinosaurs.
If modern animals were living alongside the Dinosaurs, that means the Theory of Evolution is not Correct; Given the Theory of Evolution states that Animals are Constantly changing, loosing and Gaining anatomy over Time.
Isn't reason and Logic Great!!!
Given the Bible says that all animals on Earth were created in Six Days, of a Seven day Week; The Bible actually fits the Fossil Record Evidence more Closely than the theory of Evolution. If all the Animals Existed at the Same Time on this Planet, then it makes sense that they would be finding Modern animals which Still Exist today, that lived before, and During the Time of the Dinosaurs all in the Same Fossil Layers. However, if evolution is Correct and Animals are Mutating into new ones, at the Rate of which an Apelike Being would be able to become a Woman in 3 Million Years; well that
doesn't fit the Evidence found in the Fossil Record.
The Point isn't that these Fossils are Believed to be Millions of Years old that is Interesting, what is interesting, is that
Animals Containing all the Same anatomy that Modern ones do today, lived before the Dinosaurs; Yet Evolutionists believe that Dinosaurs Evolved into Birds.
I could go and Find you a Feather that is Preserved in Amber that is Older than a Raptor, but that probably wont impress you, Barbie, because you will just say that, "it came from a Feathered Dinosaur, which must have lived before the Raptor."; Well, I will still post the Interesting Feathers I find on the Way. What I really need is A Fossilized Chicken that is Much older than the Already Classified Birds that lived during the Time of the Dinosaurs, that will really throw a Wrench in the Theory that Dinos Turned into Chickens.
====================================
http://digitallibrary.amnh.org/dspace/handle/2246/3571
http://www.livescience.com/16069-amber-feathers-dinosaur-birds.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confuciusornis
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaurs-living-descendants-69657706/?no-ist
The Above is a Bird, Called the "Confuciusornis";
It was about this Big compared to the Woman, See?
Not Huge like a Feathered Dinosaur, but small like a Bird.
The Smithsonian Link has information on the Founder, and the Bird is not a Dinosaur, but lived before some Dinosaurs even Existed, which proves that the Theory that Dinosaurs are no Longer around because they Turned into Birds is Obviously False.
It is a Bird which contains;
A Wishbone, and Feathers.
Unlike The Much younger Archaeopteryx previously mentioned by Al,
(Archaeopteryx)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx
this Confuciusornis Bird Contains the Same Anatomical Features that many Modern Birds do Today, such as a Wishbone. It seems that Birds are less likely to have Descended from Dinosaurs, and more likely from this Bird, which seems to contain all the Like Features that Most Modern Bird Species do Today, such as A Toothless Beak and A Wishbone.
===================================
Consider the Above Bird that Lived Before the Archaeopteryx, now consider this next Bird which also Lived before Archaeopteryx;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurornis
"Aurornis lived roughly 160 million years ago, roughly
10 million years prior to Archaeopteryx, which often
has been described as the first bird." (Described and Said to be the First Bird By Evolutionists that is, which has obviously been Disproved given the Existence of Fossils which are of a Bird which have dated to be Much older than the Archaeopteryx. =M=)
Look at that Bird, and it lived long before the Archaeopteryx, which is what Most Evolutionists believed that Birds Descended From, and the Archaeopteryx looks far less like Modern Birds, than the Aurornis.
Fossil Chicken Found;
============================================
Now that I've Addressed you Barbie; Why don't you answer my Evolutionist Questions, they are;
Three Other simple to understand Questions;
When do you believe the First Fruit tree Formed?
What kind of Fruit was it?
How Has it Changed in the Time It's Existed, does it still look and Taste the Same?
Why Do Evolutionists Believe that Humans are the Only Animal that did not Exist Five Million Years Ago?
Shouldn't man be the Oldest Animal in the Fossil Record, Given we are the Most advanced?
That's Right, there really is Fossilized Fruit;
They look just like their modern Versions.
Granted, it's easier to find fossilized Leaves that prove the Tree Type.
What's the Matter ash, It's not Evolving?
==================================
MUSIC!!!
its ok,, i admire your thinking... its more then most do.. keep going...
