Canada bans 1500 kinds of military style weapons.
- Thread starter eider
- Start date
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Why'd you ask the question in the first place?
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Guess I'm out of luck.
eider
Well-known member
To see if you had any kind of training in you, automatic, right there.
It wasn't.
It was so long back that I even forgot about it.
eider
Well-known member
So you've learned something.
The whole point of insurance is that the victims of gun accidents, crimes, torts etc......... can be protected financially.owners.
And you can't.......... you don't have mandatory all risks insurance for gun users, holders,
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Canada bans 1500 kinds of military style weapons
This should put to the test all those apocalyptic predictions from America's gun lobby as to the dire consequences that would surely ensue should there be any restrictions placed on gun owner!ship!
At the very least, Canadians should be prepared for their democratic institutions coming under attack, the Prime Minister's refusal to accept the outcome of the next election and the prospect of its authoritarian leaders resorting to the deployment of federal forces as their private state police to quell any public dissent - all in the name of restoring "law and order!"
This should put to the test all those apocalyptic predictions from America's gun lobby as to the dire consequences that would surely ensue should there be any restrictions placed on gun owner!ship!
At the very least, Canadians should be prepared for their democratic institutions coming under attack, the Prime Minister's refusal to accept the outcome of the next election and the prospect of its authoritarian leaders resorting to the deployment of federal forces as their private state police to quell any public dissent - all in the name of restoring "law and order!"
Last edited:
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
You're presumptuous then.
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
We don't have that for anything, other accidents, crimes, torts etc. Does the UK?
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
The consequentialist argument against restricting a human right isn't the thrust of its defense, it's merely concomitant. The thrust of the argument is because it's immoral to do it.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Dude you gotta like dumb it down or he won't understand.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh wow, the irony. You couldn't even get the sarcasm that should have been obvious in my own post about buying chocolates...
:freak:
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Jgarden never actually engages with anything anyway. He just advertises. Blogs.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
With! Lots! Of! Exclamation! Pointy! Goodness!
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Well that's true l o l
eider
Well-known member
Foolish idea!
How is seeking for any kind of discovery presumptive?
And you took so long to figure out what you would do that you've shown us that you'd be in a complete dead loss on the day, in the minute.
I wondered if you could make any kind of answer 'there and then'.
It told me how much experience you really do have ..... is all.
eider
Well-known member
We don't have 300+ million guns awash in our country.
And we don't have an NRA which is creaking at the seams with corruption at the top....... or so we hear.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Why that's not presumptuous at all!
That's presumption.
I did no such thing. Because we live in a country with like 400 million civilian owned guns lots of us have spent long hours thinking through all sorts of scenarios where we'd be armed and the situation might require that we use our arms to defend either our own lives /limbs, or someone else's, like our families, or neighbors. We do it all the time, and have been doing it all the time for decades. All the time, Eider. I know that you over across the pond don't do that and that's because I'm guessing, first blush, because you don't have 120 guns per every 100 of yous over there. If we have a gun here, it's possible that we'll consider different scenarios that might occur---might (unlikely but possible)---and how we would respond.
Right. Totally fine thing to wonder.
Presumption again.