Biden won't shoot down Chinese spy balloon over US

T

ThePartyPooper

BANNED
Banned
Biden won't shoot down Chinese spy balloon over US

Retired Lt. Col. Daniel Davis breaks down why the Pentagon would recommend to President Biden against shooting down a Chinese spy balloon hovering over northern U.S. states on 'Jesse Watters Primetime.'

The ballon has money and drugs for Pedophile Biden's son Hunter, that's why.

 
T

ThePartyPooper

BANNED
Banned
The same country that told us there is no way that a virus could escape from their lab is the same country that let a balloon fly 7000 miles off course
 
T

ThePartyPooper

BANNED
Banned
Man, my brain is slipping, and apparently so is everybody else's, especially our military

Who remembers their good old Cold war Soviet nuclear doctrine? Prior to a nuclear attack on American soil several nukes are exploded up in the air to cause an EMP pulse. This knocks out all electronics and communications so that when the attack begins we are in the dark.

If the Chinese had wanted to, they could have detonated a multi-megaton warhead in that balloon and knocked out all communications in the central United States, thus paralyzing our ground-based nuclear forces.

Is there anybody in this forum who realizes the magnitude of what that balloon fly over meant? And more than that, what Biden's lack of response meant? It means Biden is not qualified to be in charge of our nuclear forces and he needs to be thrown out of office immediately. That balloon should have been shot down the minute it crossed our airspace. Our leadership is in total capitulation. We have no defenses. The Chinese are now free to launch a nuclear attack anytime they want to.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Jefferson said:
Yeah, it was shot down over the ocean so that Beijing Biden will probably never be able to recover it to disclose to the world if it was a spy balloon or a weather balloon.
Click to expand...
Or possibly, just maybe it wasn't shot down until over the ocean because the debris could have killed people on the ground, just to add a non conspiracy option here...
 
Last edited:
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Arthur Brain said:
Over a million people and there was risk of civilian casualties. If the decision was made to take it down before over the ocean and people died/were injured as a result I'll bet you'd be criticizing that as well, right?
Click to expand...
You obviously have no idea how expansive Montana is. Just do an image search for Montana and see for yourself.
 
ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Jefferson said:
You obviously have no idea how expansive Montana is. Just do an image search for Montana and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
The total area of England is 130,279 sq km, and the total area of Montana is 380,800 sq km. England is smaller than Montana by 250,521 sq km. England is around 2.92 times smaller than Montana.

Screenshot_20230205-001257.png
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Jefferson said:
You obviously have no idea how expansive Montana is. Just do an image search for Montana and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
And? Just shoot it down and hope it doesn't hit anybody anyway? At that altitude I don't see the problem with waiting for it to travel over the ocean before being taken down.
 
Jefferson

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
ok doser said:
The total area of England is 130,279 sq km, and the total area of Montana is 380,800 sq km. England is smaller than Montana by 250,521 sq km. England is around 2.92 times smaller than Montana.

View attachment 5555
Click to expand...
Population of England = 56 million
Population of Montana = 1 million

You're right. It might have landed on a cow. But probably not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top