America And Its Warm Embrace of Anti Semitism

7djengo7

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Nick M said:
I was called a Jew this afternoon X for pointing out muslims have committed mass murder. It isn't the first time. What is especially funny is according to the left I am a Nazi, a N***** and a Jew all at once. 🤣.

Go figure.
Click to expand...
In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick. He gets incensed when Christians point out the Bible truth that Jesus is a Jew. He writes:
Jesus could NOT be Jewish as the term JEW is a modern invention

It did not exist 2000 years ago


The term Jew is a modern invention from the 1850s when the Zlonlst movement was founded and Communism took off in the West

According to "jack" the Jew-hater, despite the "fact" that "term Jew is a modern invention from the 1850s",
Jews have been expelled from 1000s of lands. This was when all Jews were Orthodox

100s of great men have warned against Jews for thousands of years

So, Jews have been "warned against for thousands of years", even though, according to "jack", nobody was even a Jew until "the 1850s".

When a Christian pointed out the fact that, on the contrary, Jesus was a Jew, "jack" reacted by saying to him:
Like I said, you Jews never refute the facts

The mentally-degenerate, Bible-despising, Christ-hating "jack" refuses to admit the obvious Bible fact that Jesus is a Jew -- despite the Bible's genealogical record of Jesus' human ancestry proving it. And yet, "jack" addresses as "Jew" an anonymous dissenter to his raving in a forum, having 0 clue as to the dissenter's genealogy.
 
7djengo7

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
7djengo7 said:
In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick.
Click to expand...
"jack" also writes:

They throw out pc-diktats like ''anti semitism'' or claim that 'Jesus was jewish'' which serves to derail the discussion into abstractions and steer away from the actual fact that the TaImud is the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind

Which is why 8 successive Popes ordered it burned starting from the 13th century when it was first translated into English

They are not debating in good faith -- Deception is their motto

Here, we see "jack" complaining about something he calls "the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind". Immediately, by his context, we see that by his term "anti-Christian", he doesn't even mean anti-Christian, but instead, he means anti-Romanist.

Papist "jack" says "8 successive Popes ordered [the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind] burned". Which makes one wonder how "jack" would label all the other stuff Romanists have burned; I mean, if whatever he calls "the Talmud" is "the SOLE explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to man", then what would he call, say, the writings of Luther burned by Pope Leo X?
 
ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
7djengo7 said:
"jack" also writes:

They throw out pc-diktats like ''anti semitism'' or claim that 'Jesus was jewish'' which serves to derail the discussion into abstractions and steer away from the actual fact that the TaImud is the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind

Which is why 8 successive Popes ordered it burned starting from the 13th century when it was first translated into English

They are not debating in good faith -- Deception is their motto

Here, we see "jack" complaining about something he calls "the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind". Immediately, by his context, we see that by his term "anti-Christian", he doesn't even mean anti-Christian, but instead, he means anti-Romanist.

Papist "jack" says "8 successive Popes ordered [the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind] burned". Which makes one wonder how "jack" would label all the other stuff Romanists have burned; I mean, if whatever he calls "the Talmud" is "the SOLE explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to man", then what would he call, say, the writings of Luther burned by Pope Leo X?
Click to expand...
Expecting logic and consistency from these people is an exercise in folly
 
7djengo7

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
ok doser said:
Expecting logic and consistency from these people is an exercise in folly
Click to expand...
I'm so far not set up to post comments in TGP (or Breitbart, or other such platforms) but I scroll through them fairly frequently. So many times I've been itching to chime in, though. It's always nice to see that a few others are posting in those threads, doing what they can to refute such ridiculousness.
 
7djengo7

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
Nick M said:

Borrowed from Ray Comfort, unmonetized for commentary and discussion. From his video 180 The Movie.
Click to expand...
Greek? Yeah, right. More like Orc:
8074-1-1328651205.jpg
 
B

Bladerunner

Active member
7djengo7 said:
In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick. He gets incensed when Christians point out the Bible truth that Jesus is a Jew. He writes:
Jesus could NOT be Jewish as the term JEW is a modern invention

It did not exist 2000 years ago




Click to expand...



Answer:
you need to read your Bible a little bit more. "Jew" is a term used in the OT, 10x and the NT 22x.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top