America And Its Warm Embrace of Anti Semitism

[7djengo7]

I was called a Jew this afternoon X for pointing out muslims have committed mass murder. It isn't the first time. What is especially funny is according to the left I am a Nazi, a N***** and a Jew all at once. .

Go figure.

In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick. He gets incensed when Christians point out the Bible truth that Jesus is a Jew. He writes:

Jesus could NOT be Jewish as the term JEW is a modern invention It did not exist 2000 years ago

The term Jew is a modern invention from the 1850s when the Zlonlst movement was founded and Communism took off in the West

According to "jack" the Jew-hater, despite the "fact" that "term Jew is a modern invention from the 1850s",

Jews have been expelled from 1000s of lands. This was when all Jews were Orthodox 100s of great men have warned against Jews for thousands of years

So, Jews have been "warned against for thousands of years", even though, according to "jack", nobody was even a Jew until "the 1850s".

When a Christian pointed out the fact that, on the contrary, Jesus was a Jew, "jack" reacted by saying to him:

Like I said, you Jews never refute the facts

The mentally-degenerate, Bible-despising, Christ-hating "jack" refuses to admit the obvious Bible fact that Jesus is a Jew -- despite the Bible's genealogical record of Jesus' human ancestry proving it. And yet, "jack" addresses as "Jew" an anonymous dissenter to his raving in a forum, having 0 clue as to the dissenter's genealogy.

 

[7djengo7]

In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick.

"jack" also writes:

They throw out pc-diktats like ''anti semitism'' or claim that 'Jesus was jewish'' which serves to derail the discussion into abstractions and steer away from the actual fact that the TaImud is the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind Which is why 8 successive Popes ordered it burned starting from the 13th century when it was first translated into English They are not debating in good faith -- Deception is their motto

Here, we see "jack" complaining about something he calls "the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind". Immediately, by his context, we see that by his term "anti-Christian", he doesn't even mean anti-Christian, but instead, he means anti-Romanist.

Papist "jack" says "8 successive Popes ordered [the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind] burned". Which makes one wonder how "jack" would label all the other stuff Romanists have burned; I mean, if whatever he calls "the Talmud" is "the SOLE explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to man", then what would he call, say, the writings of Luther burned by Pope Leo X?

 

[ok doser]

"jack" also writes:

They throw out pc-diktats like ''anti semitism'' or claim that 'Jesus was jewish'' which serves to derail the discussion into abstractions and steer away from the actual fact that the TaImud is the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind Which is why 8 successive Popes ordered it burned starting from the 13th century when it was first translated into English They are not debating in good faith -- Deception is their motto

Here, we see "jack" complaining about something he calls "the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind". Immediately, by his context, we see that by his term "anti-Christian", he doesn't even mean anti-Christian, but instead, he means anti-Romanist.

Papist "jack" says "8 successive Popes ordered [the sole explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to mankind] burned". Which makes one wonder how "jack" would label all the other stuff Romanists have burned; I mean, if whatever he calls "the Talmud" is "the SOLE explicitly anti-Christian doctrine known to man", then what would he call, say, the writings of Luther burned by Pope Leo X?

Expecting logic and consistency from these people is an exercise in folly

 

[7djengo7]

Expecting logic and consistency from these people is an exercise in folly

I'm so far not set up to post comments in TGP (or Breitbart, or other such platforms) but I scroll through them fairly frequently. So many times I've been itching to chime in, though. It's always nice to see that a few others are posting in those threads, doing what they can to refute such ridiculousness.

 

[Nick M]

Expecting logic and consistency from these people is an exercise in folly

Borrowed from Ray Comfort, unmonetized for commentary and discussion. From his video 180 The Movie.

 

[7djengo7]

Borrowed from Ray Comfort, unmonetized for commentary and discussion. From his video 180 The Movie.

Greek? Yeah, right. More like Orc:

 

[ok doser]

Greek? Yeah, right. More like Orc:

John 6:55

Looks like meat's back on the menu boys!

 

[Bladerunner]

In the comments section at The Gateway Pundit, some Father Coughlin-wannabe called "jack" routinely performs the "Let’s join Hitler in blaming the Jews for all the evils in the world!" shtick. He gets incensed when Christians point out the Bible truth that Jesus is a Jew. He writes:

Jesus could NOT be Jewish as the term JEW is a modern invention It did not exist 2000 years ago

Answer: you need to read your Bible a little bit more. "Jew" is a term used in the OT, 10x and the NT 22x.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Answer: you need to read your Bible a little bit more. "Jew" is a term used in the OT, 10x and the NT 22x.

Fail.

 

[7djengo7]

Answer: you need to read your Bible a little bit more. "Jew" is a term used in the OT, 10x and the NT 22x.

I'm not thinking "jack" cares a whole lot about what the Bible has to say.

 

[Bladerunner]

Fail.

how so.

 

[Bladerunner]

I'm not thinking "jack" cares a whole lot about what the Bible has to say.

then why spread lies about what it says or does not say?????