All Americans Have Blood on their Hands!

[drbrumley]

Concern would be shown by reforming the gun laws.
Not banning guns but putting in place stricter controls on people gaining access to guns.
Limits on the type of arms available to the public would also help.

What limits for the government?

 

[ok doser]

Guns are a more efficient mass killing weapon than a knife...

not this knife:

People need guns for mass slayings of their innocent victims.

not these people:

 

[BoyStan]

who gives a crap about trump?

The ARA that's who.

 

[drbrumley]

not this knife:

not these people:

You know, what amazes me about that is hardly no one fought back...just thinking aloud

 

[ok doser]

The ARA that's who.

the automotive recyclers association? :freak:

 

[drbrumley]

the automotive recyclers association? :freak:

:rotfl:

 

[BoyStan]

I seem to remember someone using a car....ban all cars.

You didn't read or understand my post.

 

[drbrumley]

You didn't read or understand my post.

Oh I read and understood.....you want to limit us....so I ask you what limit will you put upon government?

Meaning cops have tanks now and all sorts of stuff that kill you in a second...

 

[ok doser]

You know, what amazes me about that is hardly no one fought back...just thinking aloud

covered this (and got attacked by the leftists here) in my "Cowards and Heroes" thread - 911 was the point of a paradigm shift - before 911 it was assumed that hijackers were acting rationally and that giving them what they wanted, not confronting them, was the safest way to save the lives of the passengers

now it's assumed that any hijacker is on a suicide mission and wants to boost the body count

 

[ok doser]

It will take a very broad brush to reform the gun laws!

what would you suggest?

be specific

 

[drbrumley]

covered this (and got attacked by the leftists here) in my "Cowards and Heroes" thread - 911 was the point of a paradigm shift - before 911 it was assumed that hijackers were acting rationally and that giving them what they wanted, not confronting them, was the safest way to save the lives of the passengers

now it's assumed that any hijacker is on a suicide mission and wants to boost the body count

I can ride with that.

 

[BoyStan]

:rotfl:

Dr Brumley you may laugh. Your only showing your lack of understanding and concern for the problem of guns in America.

 

[drbrumley]

Dr Brumley you may laugh. Your only showing your lack of understanding and concern for the problem of guns in America.

I know, only liberals have the correct answer.

 

[ok doser]

for you brum - had to dig for it - haven't revisited that thread in quite a while: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...s-and-Heroes&p=4517792&viewfull=1#post4517792

 

[drbrumley]

for you brum - had to dig for it - haven't revisited that thread in quite a while: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...s-and-Heroes&p=4517792&viewfull=1#post4517792

much obliged... :e4e:

 

[Idolater]

covered this (and got attacked by the leftists here) in my "Cowards and Heroes" thread - 911 was the point of a paradigm shift - before 911 it was assumed that hijackers were acting rationally and that giving them what they wanted, not confronting them, was the safest way to save the lives of the passengers

now it's assumed that any hijacker is on a suicide mission and wants to boost the body count

Kamikaze changes everything. It opens up the nuclear option. Cf. 1945.

 

[ok doser]

Kamikaze changes everything. It opens up the nuclear option. Cf. 1945.

you might appreciate this - I'm going to see if I can get it to stream and listen to it tonight while I button up for the coming cold front: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...s-and-Heroes&p=4519398&viewfull=1#post4519398

 

[Idolater]

Dr Brumley you may laugh. Your only showing your lack of understanding and concern for the problem of guns in America.

There's a murderer problem here, not a gun problem, a murderer problem worse than in other Western nations, and not even close to as bad as in some Central and South American countries like Honduras, Jamaica, and Brazil.

Those countries all have strict gun control, and yet murders yearly dwarf those occurring in the US. And, the number of civilian-owned guns in America dwarf the number of guns in every other country, including every country south of our border.

We have more than twice as many guns per capita as the next closest country in the world (Yemen), and easily 10 times more than almost everybody else, and closer to 100 times as many as some countries.

And yet murders do not correlate to the number of guns among civilians. Which means murders only correlate to murderers, and there are more here than in Japan or Australia, and there are far fewer here than in Brazil and Colombia.

Murderers are real. And murderers are why we have the inalienable right to keep and bear arms, and murderers are why that right shall not be infringed.


* Note that 'per capita' is implied in the above wrt murders and murderers and guns.

 

[ok doser]

There's a murderer problem here, not a gun problem, a murderer problem worse than in other Western nations, and not even close to as bad as in some Central and South American countries like Honduras, Jamaica, and Brazil.

Those countries all have strict gun control, and yet murders yearly dwarf those occurring in the US. And, the number of civilian-owned guns in America dwarf the number of guns in every other country, including every country south of our border.

We have more than twice as many guns per capita as the next closest country in the world (Yemen), and easily 10 times more than almost everybody else, and closer to 100 times as many as some countries.

And yet murders do not correlate to the number of guns among civilians. Which means murders only correlate to murderers, and there are more here than in Japan or Australia, and there are far fewer here than in Brazil and Colombia.

Murderers are real. And murderers are why we have the inalienable right to keep and bear arms, and murderers are why that right shall not be infringed.


* Note that 'per capita' is implied in the above wrt murders and murderers and guns.

the figures look even less impressive if you take out the black on black gang/drug shootings like those that plague chicago and la

 

[glorydaz]

The President and his government support the ARA. Campaign funds maybe?
Any public show of his tears and prayers would be fake and pretend.

That's a lie and a false accusation. Take it back.

I support the NRA, and my tears are real....as are my prayers for those who are lost to any kind of violence. My particular prayers are for the innocent children that are beaten, starved, and left to die in their own dirty diapers by their very own parents....because of the evil among us. Not the guns among us.