Search results

Well it's not false, it's Jesus's Church so.

I have receipts Clete. Yours is an untenable position. I'm just stating history. This is no way to start if you disagree with me. This is basically all I'm saying. It's just direct inference. It follows both rationally and historically. I made bold the things I know for certain are...

I insist you hold me to my own standard. How else can I know, if I am deceived, that my standard is the wrong standard? How else can I learn? if I'm not held to my own standard? and get a taste of my own medicine?

I said maybe.

If you charge me with a crime, I have a right to understand the charges. And I also have a right that my accusers aren't themselves guilty of what they're charging me with.

Hey @Right Divider thanks for 'liking' my post with your 'lol'. If you want to engage I'm sure you could. Tell me what you think legalism means so that I can defend myself against the charge you all are making against me. I have a right.

You found that funny RD (@Right Divider)? did you? with your little 'lol' there? How about you wade in to the discussion instead of just taking pot shots from the sidelines? Be a man.

This is all vague posting. Define your term legalism, or stop using it. This all started because I insinuated that you aren't allowed to commit adultery. I'm sure every single one of you (and @Right Divider too, who hasn't directly participated in the vague posting nonetheless 'likes' all you...

(y) There you have it. That's just one of the dozens, if not hundreds, if not tens of thousands of claims and promises made by Democratic party candidates during an election. President Trump is just like, "Oh, you Democrats think you can quietly bribe your way into office. Here I'll do you...

It's so difficult to not hit back, after you're hit. But we're not allowed to hit back here. Rules of the road, and it's their road. That's fair. But you and me, maybe @VladtheDestroyer idk, but there aren't many of us, who aren't fully onboard the Acts 9er train here, and so we're...

This is just doing out loud what the Democrats do quietly, and frankly it's brilliant. It's a good bet to place. I agree with the bet. This will hopefully lead to the eradication of open-secret-bribery that's always going on in national elections between the candidates and the electorate...

I haven't heard anything yet, but I'm not paying close attention either so. It'd be surprising if some known but not well-known QB out of the past winds up being christened the Greatest Of All Time. It might be able to however, tell us just how good someone like Aaron Rodgers truly was during...

This is all pretty consistent with what I believe as a standard Catholic. Is there a verse that says this explicitly, or is this an interpretation of various Scriptures? I don't necessarily disagree with it as an interpretation, I think it is an edifying interpretation of the Scripture, I'm...

Let me see your consistency. Witchcraft is obv wrong. Is it wrong to entertain witchcraft? I think you will say yes. I will say that it is wrong to dwell on witchcraft, and I will further say that if you find yourself already entertaining witchcraft, that it would be wrong to continue to...

lol. I'm giving anti-conspiratorialists the benefit of the doubt for some reason.

Statistically we've lost more men by accident in training accidents in the six months, than we lost in combat with Iran. And it isn't even close.

Man I guess we're not going to be electing him to a third term, geez. There goes that theory.

Your interpretation of the data is noted. And it is merely an interpretation of the data, is my point, for anybody left wondering. My interpretation is that if someone's blowing up barns and all the barns he's blowing up are brown, and nobody's blowing up any red barns, then probably the fact...

Well I guess Catholicism is Open Theism then Vlad. Curiouser and curiouser.

= The Apostles' own interpretation is in Luke 24:35 $$ Lu 24:35 And they told what things [were done] in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread. They explained they perceived Him re John 6:33ff and 1st Corinthians 10:16-17. (They also seem to omit any mention of...