Search results

False dichotomy. God is not “limited like a human” simply because He does not know non-existent future free choices as settled facts before they are made. God knows all that is real. God knows all that is knowable that He wants to know. God can discover anything He needs to know. The issue is...

Thank you for taking the time to respond. I tried to reduce my response as much as possible, but it still ended up long. But in my defense, in the words of Treebeard: "You must understand, young hobbit, it takes a long time to say anything in Old Entish, and Ents never say anything unless it...

The very purpose of "democracy" is that everyone gets a say. No matter how stupid. They've already done that.

Strictly speaking, Open Theists are the ones who actually believe God can foreknow, because “fore” is a temporal word. Your view is not really foreknowledge from God’s perspective. It is timeless knowledge. Open Theism says God can know future events when those future events are knowable...

Everything's about race to you. Here's a tip: stop viewing things through the lens of what color people's skin is. Maybe you'll stop being racist yourself.

I was able to find all but the third one. They've obviously been changed by this point, which tends to happen after such things are exposed. https://www-doc.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/details?x=1251181&n=0 https://www-doc.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/details?x=1472506&n=0...

It's embedded into the TOL page, Anna. Maybe wait a moment for the embed to open before making a judgement call next time. You don't have to open X to see the post on TOL. These people look white to you? Their names seem middle-eastern? North African?

Did you miss the part where beneath the photos of black men are "Race: white"? Or was that intentional? In which case his analysis was spot on. But sure, anything that exposes your agenda of calling anyone who disagrees with you a racist must actually be racism!

Well he's certainly being enabled to live rent free in your mind...

Something to help illustrate my point:

The age of the discussion does not mean that the defeaters have been answered. If the specific objections I summarized above have been answered, then please refresh my memory, or point to where they were answered. Otherwise, I’ll refer you back to the summary rather than repeat all of it here...

Since you keep saying this is all repetition, let me summarize the actual defeaters of your position and the questions your position still has not answered, so that if you make an argument that falls under one of these defeaters, I can simply refer you back here. 1. You have not shown that...

Not honestly. If you refuse to read the answers, then you do not get to claim the answers were not given or are insufficient. That is about the same time you stopped answering my arguments at all. And this is circular. You say you will not read the replies because nothing new is being said...

No, that's what's in dispute. The Constitution does not say, “the soil under the hospital bed overrides the political status of the family.” The Constitution says a person must be born in the United States AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof. You are assuming that second requirement is...

I thought it was really good. But I've always been a fan of scifi stuff. Haven't read the book yet, so can't compare it. But I can definitely recommend it as a movie. https://criticless.com/titles/project-hail-mary

Sure. And I appreciate the question being asked that way. Fair warning, this will probably be quite long. The primary premise of Open Theism is that God is free. Every theological system starts with that premise at the beginning. Whether God remains free in their system is a different matter...

Mostly agreed, with one important clarification. Subjects do not have supreme civil authority over the king. They do not have jurisdiction to command him, prosecute him, judge him (in the judicial sense), or remove him. What they do have is moral responsibility before God, which means they...

Then you cannot complain that your points have not been answered. Those “seven sentences” contained multiple claims, accusations, and misrepresentations of my position. I answered them individually because that is what actually moves a discussion forward. If you will not read the answers, that...