Search results

Oh you're a piece of history then (seriously). I never personally interacted with him, even though from time to time over the years he would post on TOL. I may have replied to one of his posts once, but he really only rarely posted so he didn't reply to lots of other posters as well.

Exactly. The quality and performance of our police, our walking Constitution, our incarnate laws, is a reflection on who hires and fires. You didn't fire this guy? You hired him and you didn't then fire him? Incompetent boob. DEI. Captured by the Left. But who hires and fires he who hires...

Yes. Yes. You have a ram who happens to be stuck, he can't move, Abraham only needs to waltz over and grab him. We're supposed to think, under Open Theism, that this is a coincidence. Just really lucky.

I've prompted AI with original content and had it rewrite it. It came out as distinctively AI even though the content was mine and original, the way AI words things is distinctive and identifiable. Like when a content creator says that she's going to articulate the contours of something, I...

Yes we can. My point is that while I am unusual in being able to shift my theology qualitatively, categorically, and in step changes, that my prima facie lived experience of your theology is that it makes God look pathetic to me. You're right to push back and ask whether it's justified that...

This picture is showing that while we are close enough to the star we call the Sun, for its warmth and brightness, we are too close for all its ejecta, which is, some of it, fatal. I don't mean instantly fatal, but chronically. It's bad for life to be this close to a star. But lo and behold...

If He didn't know the answer to the question when He asked it the whole interpretation of the scene is different to me and conflicts with how I've always understood it, all the way from my youth. I'm OK with such traumatic shifts in how I read the Scripture. I can countenance the possibility...

Carrying over from Fidderent Stuff I agree, and I've always agreed, and this is why I constantly advise that you should watch¹ The Game with Michael Douglas and Sean Penn, because this is the whole premise of the movie. You can do what is indistinguishable on paper from predetermining and...

Agreed. When you subject this passage to the same scrutiny Open Theists subject "Now I know" to, the necessary inference is that God foreknew that David would incriminate himself. That was obv the setup. God knew that David wouldn't detect that it was a setup, and David didn't, he walked...

Naturally an atheist isn't going to want to call it designed because that entails a designer, but it's still just all too perfect. They still have a huge explanatory problem, even if they won't called it designed. The World is too perfect.

"He's an ANGRY elf."

Above the fold this time! "Narrative" of Christian founding! FAKE! You mean the factual reality, NYT? I mean FAG (Fake And Gay) Times? The reality? The fact of the matter? FAKE and GAY. What the FAG Times (Fake And Gay) fails to acknowledge because their editors are probably captured and...

And that the code wrote itself means the Universe is fine-tuned for such automatic code-writing, which remains a problem for the atheist. They have only kicked the can down the road a bit. They still have no natural explanation for why the Universe happens to be fine-tuned for code to write...

Thank you. It was like a bearded man yelling, as Mona Lisa, if I recall correctly. Something like that anyway.

And if Kim Kardashian is dressing to provoke male reproductive arousal everywhere she goes in public, is that "adult material"? Cite. That's all I have to do, that's my duty; what about the nine year old who sees Kim Kardashian presenting herself as a walking thirst trap in public? What ...

@annabenedetti you can do it you can be responsible you've already admitted it just do the right thing and edit your post You've already admitted it, don't make me report it

Correct. That's what I said. She just confirmed it. She just did it again.

She admitted it Arthur. Why are you so retarded.

Peter occupied an office that is singularly supreme, Peter the man wasn't. His office is the vicariate of the throne of David, Christ's throne. He had the right as vicar of Christ (like a prime minister) to wield the papacy's power. The keys of the kingdom of Heaven, the power to bind and...

She did.