Search results

Which doesn't inherently make us ultra-dispensationalists. Or can't you take us at our word when we say "We're not ultra-dispensationalists"? As mentioned before: The ENTIRE BIBLE is FOR everyone, regardless of Jew or Gentile. However, some parts of the Bible are written TO specific groups...

People like you say the darndest things... :LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL:

Me thinks you aren't contributing anything to the thread with this kind of post.

Saying it doesn't make it so. I quoted scripture. You have mere assertion. Wrong. His rising from the dead shows His power. His willingness to die on the cross shows us His love. His death reconciled the entire world to Himself, and His life saves those who call upon Him. That's what...

False. "We shall be saved by His LIFE" Romans 5:10 Scripture cannot be more clear. Wrong. For “whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” - Romans 10:13 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans10:13&version=NKJV Scripture cannot be more clear. In mercy and truth...

That's not how "discussion" works. As Clete mentioned earlier, taking the discussion in a direction that the OP of the thread wasn't expecting is not against the rules. In fact, it can be far more fruitful (not to mention fun) than expecting everyone to just simply go along with the flow of...

Do you have a mouse in your pocket or something? Debatable. No, it wasn't. Not sufficiently. And certainly not by "historical fact." See Clete's post.

"could exist" or "could not exist"?

In other words, I agree, but that does not inherently preclude me or anyone else from coming into your thread and pointing out perceived errors in those views, which is entirely the point Arial doesn't seem to understand, and the point we've been trying to make.

In what way is me, or anyone for that matter, presenting their views in another person's thread preventing that person from presenting their own views? Chrys, it's a forum. Barring breaking the rules, you can post just about whatever you want (within reason) and literally no other member can...

How about on the forum in general?

False. My beliefs have no bearing on what is true. I simply believe what it is that has been shown, through rational discourse, to be true. I am completely open to changing what I believe, so long as it can be shown to be a more valid position than what I currently hold to. So far, you have...

Because truth matters. Truth matters. If what you believe is based on falsehoods, it will affect the way you think. We don't. No one said you couldn't have your own beliefs or speak about them. That's what this entire forum is for. The problem is that YOU are the one who doesn't want to...

Cleaned up the thread of off-topic political discussion. Please remember that this is a thread in the Religion section. It is not a place for political discussion not directly related to the thread topic.

https://theweeklyworldview.com/99-cent-rant/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. 99 Cent Rant Posted on January 16, 2022 Tune in America’s most attractive audio engineer and her host for the full 9 yards. Homeschooling quietly...

https://theweeklyworldview.com/false-positive/ Links to the stories mentioned here that are not present in this post can be found at the link above. False Positive Posted on January 9, 2022 Listen in as America’s most popular audio engineer and her host recount how the confluence of celebrity...

I'd rather have a Christian Theonomy (constitutional monarchy) than a democracy. Theocracy will come later when Christ returns.

Here's hoping! (Sorry, I had to!)

Yes, it is. Neither am I, nor is Clete. Possible only in the sense that it's just one interpretation. However, there is only one TRULY possible way of viewing Revelation CORRECTLY. If you're resistant to one view just because you don't like it, or you think it's irrelevant, or unnecessary...

Fixed