Search results

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/gyzzxj/nasas-solar-probe-found-things-near-the-sun-that-we-cant-explain When one's model is constantly having issues explaining how things work, maybe the model being used is incorrect, and should be discarded or revised...

https://phys.org/news/2019-12-efficient-thermal-cooling-method.html Using things God designed for new tech tends to result in some pretty nifty things. Can't wait to see if she's successful, and how it will affect things in the future.

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-eviden...very-dark.html Dark Matter is a[n ad hoc] rescue device for scientists who reject God.

https://scitechdaily.com/researchers-discover-ghost-worms-mostly-unchanged-since-the-age-of-dinosaurs-despite-140-million-years-of-evolution/ Alternate Explanation: These worms are young, and not 140 million years old, but only a few thousand years old.

https://evolutionnews.org/2020/01/astrophysicist-asks-did-god-create-the-universe/ Did God create the universe? Yes.

https://www.livescience.com/amp/birth-control-brain-hypothalamus.html

:yawn: You done yet? Answer what has been presented to you.

Instead of bringing up red herrings, how about you respond to what I wrote:

So bring pedophilia charges against him. Can you? I noticed you didn't answer my question, but tried to distract from it: So you would be OK with pedophiles who didn't make the conscious choice to like children to live nextdoor to you and your family? How about if he or she was a homo? Would...

So you would be OK with pedophiles who didn't make the conscious choice to like children to live nextdoor to you and your family? How about if he or she was a homo? Would you, or would you not, like it if a pedophile moved in next door who claimed to be a pedophile only because he was "born...

Do you apply this same logic to pedophiles also? Or is it just for the homos?

Hardly any of that made any sense at all. Please correct your grammar. Loaded question. Reality is reality. It doesn't belong to anyone. If a man jumps off a train, his perception will change, but not reality. Reality is that he was on a train, then he jumped off of it, and then landed on...

There is nothing irrational at all about it, AND it perfectly fits reality. Relative to what? Dave, when you have to concede the entire point to make the argument against your opponent's position, your argument has failed. Yup, the train is stationary relative to the person on the train...

He's talking about these, you idiot: Those are called orreries.

The gifs were working for me...

It was explained clearly in the video. Calling it nonsense when you don't provide reasonable evidence against it is called an "appeal to the stone" fallacy. That is the kind of argument you have made. The SpaceX video does nothing to contradict the video I posted, and if anything, is...

That second orrery looks like it was designed. The first just looks like a jumbled mess...

The definition of motion, once again, is this: Motion: "the action or process of moving or being moved." How is motion defined: In physics, motion is the change in position of an object or a physical system with respect to its surroundings. Motion is mathematically described in terms of...

And? Notice how Dave completely ignored the point that was made about NASA allowing very few people (not "no one") to use their industrial grade vacuum chamber? False premise. Tell ya what, Dave. Why don't you try researching this topic for a bit before you start commenting on it and making...

As long as by "settled" you understand that there is no necessity for there to be a blast crater on the surface of the moon, because of how little thrust was needed by the main thruster on the lunar lander because it wasn't moving very quickly, then yes, this matter is settled. If by posting...