Search results

  1. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    Or, as Peter put it: For this they willfully forget: that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of water and in the water,by which the world that then existed perished, being flooded with water. - 2 Peter 3:5-6...
  2. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    Had Adam not sinned, it stands to reason that he and his descendants would have been able to maintain the garden, which probably could have slowed its growth. Remember, God said don't eat of it, not "don't touch." I don't know much about tree maintenance, especially for a tree with that big of...
  3. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    From below the crust of the earth. No canopy could hold that much water without all life on earth boiling from the resulting temperatures. You're confusing the two (yes, two) firmaments in Genesis 1. The "firmament" called "Heaven(s)" and the "firmament of the heavens." Also worth noting...
  4. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    Correct. The energy is converted into motion, enough energy was released to send about 3% of the earth's original total mass into space. I recommend going through this article on kgov.com: https://kgov.com/hydroplate-theory-heat-problem-walt-brown It wasn't floating, in any sense of the...
  5. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    What you believe doesn't matter. Scripture says that the waters above the firmament became "Seas." You're disagreeing with scripture at this point.
  6. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    It's not. We don't have to. We know that sound travels at different speeds throughout different materials. That's how it was measured. Not what I said. Temperature and pressure (among other factors) determines the state of any fluid. We're talking about supercritical fluids, not just...
  7. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    Which doesn't make any sense anyways according to the text, which says that the waters above the firmament became Seas, the firmament of day 2 being something different than the "firmament of the heavens" of day 4. Your argument from incredulity is a fallacy. Then you're not understanding...
  8. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    You're welcome to believe what you like, but the "waters above the firmament" became Seas, if you follow what is said closely. Because it's illogical. That's why.
  9. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    When you go from 60 miles below the surface of the earth, from supercritical, up through the rupture in the crust, the fluid expands greatly, drastically reducing it's temperature, and it would have continued to expand up (not to the sides much) through the atmosphere, getting even colder. It's...
  10. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    One of the assertions of the HPT is that there is nothing miraculous about the flood or creation, other than what is stated explicitly or is obviously a miracle, in scripture. For example, God creating things is clearly a miracle, but the animals boarding the ark, while they would be under God's...
  11. JudgeRightly

    The Flood is proof of the Creation

    What Derf said... But you're not quite paying attention. What I said was the FOUNTAINS were ice cold, not the underground chambers of water.
  12. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    And then you find fault with it... There could not have been one, violation of physics, and it would boil all life on earth. This is talking about the crust of the earth.
  13. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    Because you say so? The reason the Berezovka mammoth was frozen while eating tropical vegetation was due to the fact that he originally lived in a tropical region on the earth, at lower latitudes than where he was found. The reason he was found where he was is due to the fact that the earth...
  14. JudgeRightly

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    I'm 100% confident that it did not. Circumstantial evidence isn't enough to go off of in support of an idea. Which isn't enough to go on to make a claim that a canopy existed. You ARE clinging to it. You have so little evidence to support your belief, and what evidence you do have is...
  15. JudgeRightly

    A little comedy break....

    (song is by Yoasobi, "Yoru Ni Kakeru") (not sure what song)
  16. JudgeRightly

    Answering old threads thread

    By definition, it would not be rape. That's my point. Disobeying the doctor's orders isn't a sin. Stupidity itself is not a sin. He would have grounds to do so. But that shouldn't be the solution. If it got to that point, there is nothing wrong with finding someone else to marry. The...
  17. JudgeRightly

    Answering old threads thread

    The wife gave her consent when she married the man. Therefore it IS NOT RAPE, by definition. And married women. Their marriage contract wasn't just between them, it was with God, and every other person on the planet, saying that the two belong to each other, and no one else can violate their...
Top