Search results

I'll let Skeeter answer this for himself if he chooses to.

There's no "occasion for forcing" regardless, not if you truly loved and cherished your spouse. That in itself answers your risible latter.

It's beyond pathetic really and again reason to hope that those who advocate it remain terminally single. It would repel any reasonable man to even entertain forcing sex on his wife,

To be fair, I think he was referring to Skeeter although I don't get the utilitarian stuff anyway...

Now apply that to sex. It's permissible when both parties agree to it, pretty straightforward yeah? Otherwise, what does it say about you or anyone else who would entertain forcing an unwilling spouse into intercourse? How is that even remotely appealing if you love and cherish her? Cos it...

Sad thing is, some of these nutballs don't even think there's such a thing as rape in a marriage anyway. If a husband wants sex and his wife doesn't then eh, if he carries on regardless then no foul. It's his right.

Well, anyone who espouses that there's no such thing as marital rape is clearly clueless or..."something else"... I wouldn't go so far as to say women should always be wary of marriage though, more wary as to who they might entertain being married to...

The far right and extreme fringes, not conservatives.

For sure.

How so? Trump was warned enough times before being booted and MTG is a complete wingnut etc. Don't act like a crank and you won't get banned, pretty easy.

Was too easy but still... :ROFLMAO:

Trump & MTG hardly qualify as "conservative thought", or any thought really...

Problem is, some folk on here don't recognize that a husband forcing himself on his wife is rape anyway. It's "something else" apparently, whatever that is...

Even his own lawyers don't want to do that...

Against my better judgement I actually watched it and yup, just as you described. At the end, "Hey, buy my merchandise!" The irony is is that some folk will be stupid enough to do just that.

I'd have no issue with rape being a capital crime provided 100% proof of guilt was ascertained as it is indeed so horrendous. It's inexcusable no matter what and with who. Do you agree with that or are you going to resort back to your feeble "something else" routine? Oh, and are you going to...

Some of the Putin apologists probably think he's a philanthropist...

Based on a basic respect for other people's personal autonomy and human rights. Would you like it if you were violated? Assaulted? Do you feel empathy and compassion for people who are victims of such or any other unenviable plight? Or are they just words to you?

That was a take down and then some. Bravo...

If you can't understand that forcing yourself on another is wrong then you're in no position to criticize anyone else's morality. You should intrinsically be repulsed by the notion and yet for some reason, you're not. Oh, and it matters not if the person in question is married or not, they have...