Search results

I need a number, Mind... How far can we see?

Funny, you'd think that the image would show the sun (the little white dot at the top of the image) to decrease in size like the other items do, but it doesn't.

What's the farthest possible view distance?

Is it impossible to see something that is 20,000 miles away?

No, Dave, it's called reality.

Hi Berean, haven't seen you in a while. How've you been?

No YE Creationist accepts the atheistic origin of the universe. And yet they are still able to reject that the earth is flat. Hmmm, I wonder why that is, Dave...

How is this a problem? How is this a problem? I doubt that it travels. Rotates, sure. But all evidence points to the Milky Way Galaxy being near the center of the universe. Not if it was created and placed into orbit by the hand of God. Dave, here are some facts about the Solar System...

No, Dave, I'm asking you a direct question, and yes, it is in the context of a flat earth, not a globe earth. You are the one who needs to answer it. Here it is again: QUOTE=JudgeRightly;5220716 Answer my question, Dave. Why can't we see ships or buildings beyond a certain point because of...

Answer my question, Dave. Why can't we see ships or buildings beyond a certain point because of view distance, but we can see stars which, according to you, are a lot farther away than the ships/buildings, directly above the horizon?

SO WHAT? SURELY they're closer than things that are on the surface of the earth! ESPECIALLY BUILDINGS! Yet you can see the stars just fine, but the buildings you cannot see at all. Which has nothing to do with what we're talking about. THEN THEY SHOULD AFFECT THE STARS WHICH ARE BEYOND THE...

No, Dave, that is the logical conclusion. What you are suggesting is commonly known as a "rescue device." Dave, how often have you looked out to the horizon at night and been able to see stars directly above the horizon. If what you are saying is true, then we SHOULD NOT BE ABLE to see those...

Dave, quick question, did you say you had a Nikon P900?

Pretty sure that was sarcasm...

Already been addressed.

Everything in that image HAS BEEN PROVEN TO BE NONSENSE in both this thread and the original FE thread. "Proof by assertion," also known as "proof by repeated assertion," is a logical fallacy, Dave. It's where something is repeatedly stated regardless of contradiction...

None of the above are needed to explain a globe earth, so there's that. Gravity is what keeps the spherical earth a spheroid. Which is more of a conspiracy theory than an origins theory. Patrick, would you watch this for me? The Global Flood and Hydroplate Theory 3h 9m 23s...

Try using this image instead for the second half of your image.

Your attachment is broken, just so you know.

Because He did not. Did God create darkness? OR did darkness come into existence by God creating light? In the same way, "math" is a result of God creating the universe. And you didn't think that "math" includes formal mathematics, etc? Come on, Daqq. Use your head a bit. Ad hominem...