Search results

Where have I simply repeated my argument and stated that my position stands? Afaik, I have not. Yet you constantly do so. And then you walk away claiming to be the victor. You should humble yourself, TG.

Because you say so? Sorry, that's not how it works. Defend your position using logic, reason, and evidence. Otherwise your posts amount to so much hot air.

Just because something is "handed down for 2000 years" doesn't necessarily make it correct. Which is why your argument, which is an appeal to tradition which is a fallacy, is an invalid argument.

Repeating you position doesn't magically make it become a valid argument. You used fallacious arguments. I'm calling you out on them.

And what I quoted Paul as saying is in direct contradiction to Jesus saying that works are necessary. So how do you reconcile what Paul said with what Jesus said?

Saying it doesn't make it so.

He'd have a better chance of winning if more people voted for him. How about voting for what is good and right, rather than, "can my buy beat the other guy?" https://kgov.com/simpsons-two-party-system-go-ahead-throw-away-your-vote https://kgov.com/bel/20120508 https://kgov.com/bel/20080728...

So Paul was lying? For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God,not of works, lest anyone should boast. - Ephesians 2:8-9 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians2:8-9&version=NKJV that if you confess with your mouth the Lord...

Because you say so? Make the argument.

Argument from popularity. So what? Because you say so?

The Bible is meaningless nonsense? Because we are attempting to discuss what the Bible says. The Bible is the teachings of Christ, not just the words in red. :yawn:

https://kgov.com/tension-between-the-apostles-peter-and-paul @Bob Enyart

Appeal to majority is a fallacy. So is appeal to tradition.

It's not a waste to vote for someone who is against abortion.

Happy New Year, TOLers! May God be first in your lives.

This question you asked completely undermines your own position. There is no reason to think that the soil in the garden was anything other than fertile soil. So why insist that there were also fossils in the ground? It's simply adding to scripture, reading something into scripture that just...

I sure hope not...

Also discussed on the show, iirc.

Which doesn't necessarily mean that it's a bioweapon. @Bob Enyart had the director of the Van Andel Research Center in Chino Valley, Arizona, molecular biologist Dr. Kevin Anderson, on BEL to discuss the evidence AGAINST it being a manufactured bioweapon. You can find this interview at...

That's nice. https://gbdeclaration.org/