Search results

No, because most of them don't even know what it says about morality, or worse, do, and think that their opinions are better. It's a good thing morality isn't based on Christian consensus! SIMPLE. You look at what scripture says. Because Christianity is true based on the fact that Christ...

Hunger is a good thing. It's a strong motivator for people to work, to provide for not only themselves, but to also serve their neighbor. Getting rid of world hunger would only hurt the formerly hungry. Then to Adam He said, “Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from...

https://www.haaretz.com/archaeology/modern-humans-began-to-evolve-and-quickly-split-into-three-groups-1.10630058

This is called "poisoning the well." It's a fallacy for a reason. NONE of it is relevant to this discussion.

The kids aren't allowed to take the toys off the shelf to look at them. Oh, and one of them is wearing a mask...

McDonald's seems to have gone back to using plastic wrapping for their straws instead of paper.

Tutu. Not quite a skirt.

@Jefferson this is why: "I thought nothing was said about trans rights."

I would refrain from applying verses specifically speaking about the Body of Christ to this context... Acts 17 works though...

Am I incorrect in believing that you hold to the notion that there is (or are at least aware of the concept of) a multiverse? Is that not a similar belief? Also, the "supernatural realm" as you call it is simply "where" God exists, to use natural terms. And yes, we do have evidence for such a...

It really was. There's more to it. I recommend you watch the full experiment. This is called begging the question, and it has already been addressed. Like I said: Lateral motion DOES NOT AFFECT the downward pull of gravity. Which wasn't the intent to begin with. What about it? What...

Which kind of slavery? There are multiple. It did quite well on that, actually... But you wouldn't know that, because you don't seem to have ever read the Bible.

Apparently... not!

But you can't be certain that it's an impossibility, can you? In other words, not only are you not certain that it's an impossibility (because you say you aren't), but it could be possible that such a statement WOULD require absolute certainty, no? You can't be certain of anything, you say...

What, exactly, do we believe without evidence? Be specific. Do you not hold yourself to high standards?

When you make absolute statements like "we cannot know anything to be right, absolutely," then yes, yes you do need to be absolutely sure. Because if you don't, then your statement is inconsistent with not only itself, but with reality. God exists. That's an absolute. "I exist." That's an...

Are you absolutely sure?

From Wikipedia: Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position...

Of course we put credence in both. Which only applies to things within the universe. The problem is that the first and second rules only apply to that which is natural, "inside" of nature (which includes the entire universe). They do NOT apply to that which is SUPERnatural, something...

A bullet fired falls at the same rate as a bullet dropped. In other words: Lateral motion does not affect the downward pull of gravity. This was shown in Mythbusters: