Search results

Clearly not. Appeal to extremes. I don't answer fallacious questions. No, I haven't. There's nothing false about it. You've been deceived. You don't understand because you refuse to. Saying it doesn't make it so. Didn't you just get done saying that the spiritual man judges all...

Do you not understand the difference between "judging all things" and "do not judge based on appearance"? The two are not contradictory. Judging an appearance is one thing. Judging BASED ON appearance is entirely another. Why is this so hard to understand for you? Loaded question. No, I...

They hate Caviezel more than they love innocent children. (Actual love, not this fake "love" they promote.)

But he doesn't do it based on appearance. Because my faith is in Christ, nothing I do, good or bad, will affect the fact that God has given me eternal life. There were 4 other feasts that Jesus fulfilled. Feasts that were part of the Law. The three W2G mentioned were NOT fulfilled, but WILL...

So you're against child trafficking, but a movie that is also against child trafficking is "propaganda"? Talk about speaking out of both sides of your mouth!

Me: @Hoping: Doesn't respond except to react to my post with :sad:. Guess he ran out of steam with his arguments.

@Yorzhik The "rain" in verse 12 is introduced by "the windows of heaven were opened" in verse 11. That's how the passage reads. It simply doesn't allow for a canopy of any sort.

One of my favorite pages in "In the Beginning" is this one, which describes exaclty what you say wasn't happening. https://hpt.rsr.org/onlinebook/TechnicalNotes6.html Enough of the debris made it to the moon with enough force to partially melt the surface. It's not implausible to think that...

Then the burden of proof is on you to show that these phenomena existed, as Scripture does not state that there were such, nor does physics support the idea. Not liquid water. Rather, that's an explanation that secular scientists have come up with to explain where the frozen water on Mars...

So are you? If so, just say it! "I, Arthur Brain, am against child trafficking, and support the movie's message against it." You won't! So why are you complaining about a movie against that sort of thing? Who cares!? I have yet to see any criticism of the movie itself, only about what...

You do realize that the movie is based on a true story, right?

https://jalopnik.com/nissan-pathfinder-stuck-in-california-redwood-tree-1850607169 Oops.

You're sure doing a lot of yippin'! The movie is about freeing children from trafficking rings. I support that. Who cares what the actors think.

Ya know, when you throw a stone at a pack of dogs, the one that yelps is the one that got hit... Sounds like the movie is making a few people yip...

My point was that, except with outside influence (the "miracles" I mentioned) hydrogen in a canopy above the earth would simply dissipate, and quickly. It would not form a solid or enter a metallic state.

Just two verses? So, you've formed your beliefs on two verses? Do you not see the problem with that? You say "we don't have enough evidence" but when you see "windows of heaven" two times in scripture you come up with some weird theory theory based on another dead theory? And all that in...

Where's Private Ryan when you need him!

Not necessarily. Generally speaking yes, but not if it's a Christian. False. To the people of the law. Just because you cannot see a difference doesn't mean there isn't one, Hoping. Fulfilling the law is not the same as fulfilling the righteous requirement of the law. You seem to think...

Uh, no. That's not what HPT says. Nor is it what the Bible says, more importantly. Then you don't understand the theory. Hence why I posted the link above. I recommend you read it, so that you can be on the same page as us.