Search results

Again, irrelevant to the topic of prostitution being a crime. You do not have the right to sell someone's body, including your own, for sex, for sex is to be between one man and one woman, in a committed marriage relationship. Any other time, it's sexual immorality. You cannot rightly...

Love of guns has nothing to do with this. God is the one who instituted flogging as punishment for certain crimes, Idolater. Not me. Not Bob Enyart (who is the one who wrote the above). God. He's also the one who came up with the "eye for eye, hand for hand, tooth for tooth" punishments. In...

Prostitution should be a criminal offense, punishable by flogging. From America's Criminal Code: You shall not commit adultery. - Judges will execute those convicted of bestiality (Ex. 22:19; Lev. 20:15-16); those convicted of incest including with in-laws (Lev. 11-12, 14-15, 17, 19-21); of...

I want to. But I'd want to do it the right way, which would require a few resources that I don't have at the moment.

Educate yourself, please. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man What I "insist" has nothing to do with it. "Free will" IS redundant, because there is no such thing as a non-free will. A will is by definition free. 'A' cannot equal '!A.' As I stated before, repeating something for emphasis...

Straw man. I refer you to this post: Again: "free will" is redundant, because a will is, by definition, free. What emphasis do you think you're adding by saying "free will" instead of just "will"? There's a purpose to God repeating a word twice (ie, adding emphasis). There's no need to be...

Translation: "You won't accept what I believe so you must think you have a superior intellect to God." Translation: "I've run completely out of anything substantive to say so I'm going to resort to ad hominems." Oatmeal, if you can't answer the question, just say so! "I don't know" is a...

Irrelevant. Is there such a thing as a will that is not free? If not, then "free will" is redundant, because you're essentially just saying "free [will that is free]." If so, then please provide an example of a will that is not, by definition, free. You cannot, because a will is, by...

You still made the decision, did you not? You could have decided otherwise. That makes the decision done a free choice. You exercised your will. Let's not rely on one's personal definitions. Let's look at what the word ACTUALLY means: Free means not under the control or in the power of...

No, my point was that it COULD be translated to include "lamb." Not that it SHOULD be translated that way. If it SHOULD be translated that way, then what RD said was true, that it would be the only instance where Paul uses it and meant "lamb," and wouldn't much affect our position. If it...

Agreed. "Can" != "Should" I was simply pointing out that he's not necessarily adding to Scripture by using "lamb."

Being redundant is quite different than repeating something for added emphasis. In fact, doing so is, by definition, NOT redundant.

It can be translated as "Passover Lamb."

Because it inherently informs the rest of one's position on the matter, especially when it comes to the topic of God's sovereignty.

No. I mean the actual definition of the word.

Participating in something from a different dispensation does not put us under that dispensation. As Paul states clearly: But as God has distributed to each one, as the Lord has called each one, so let him walk. And so I ordain in all the churches. Was anyone called while circumcised? Let him...

?

Again: A will, BY DEFINITION, is free. Thus "free will" IS, by definition, redundant. I have no idea what this is in response to, but it doesn't seem to have anything to do with what I said. Yes, that's what it means to have a will. Again, how is this relevant to what I said? Amen...

It was required for all men who were bood descendants of Abraham. First, being "saved" means something different for Israel under the Old Covenant and New Covenant than it does for those of us in the Body of Christ. Second, women were "saved" through the head of the household. The concept...

"Free will" is redundant. A will, by definition, is free. If it's not free, it's not a will." Sin, which is disobedience to God, which is an act of the will, is enough for God to justly condemn us to eternal separation from Him. Is there any other kind? Again, "free will" is redundant...