Search results

I'll let Paul's words speak for themselves: One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind. He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it. He who...

Agreed. Thank you, and praise God! Indeed.

I'm not. I simply don't know what you mean by "a conceptual mind." Please explain.

What is that supposed to mean?

As a concept, yes.

What part of "time does not exist outside of a thinking mind" do you not understand?

Warning: GRAPHIC CONTENT! My heart hurts from seeing this. https://www.instagram.com/p/C3QLyiXLfX0/?igsh=MWpic2RncTJubnlhYg==

Happenstance is not a miracle.

I means that, as far as I can tell, Lydia was not just another Gentile woman. She was, in all likelihood, a descendant of Israel. Baptism would have been a logical step. I'm not entirely sure, though, if I were to hazard a guess, Paul's gospel. I would argue that there simply isn't enough...

I think Paul put it best: Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; nor does corruption inherit incorruption. Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed— in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last...

I think you meant Right Divider's point. Here's a hint: What did Paul customarily do whenever he visited a new city? Will Duffy doesn't touch on the baptism part necessarily, but what he says gives important context that you might have missed. Watch from 11:45 (video should play from that...

Please note, I had a proper response typed up for this, and then I lost it, so my answers will be somewhat shorter, as I don't feel like typing it all again. To establish His Kingdom on earth. Correct. Correct. Christ was planning on returning in all His glory as King of Israel. No...

I think you missed the jist of what RD just said. This is how the NKJV renders it: What RD is saying is that it should, or at least, could, read as if verse 5 is part of the previous paragraph, and thus part of Paul's recounting of John's actions, and that verse 6 is the start of a new...

No, he's not. So what?