Search results

Obviously you don't believe in justification by faith, since you tell us that people are already justified BEFORE faith. Duh. So, why would I say to you, "Do you believe in justification by faith?" seeing as I already know that you do not believe in justification by faith? Clearly, you do not...

So, according to you, Genesis 1 is not about God?

You had said: So, I asked you: Yes or No? beloved57: <NO ANSWER> You never said what? I asked you a question (which, so far, you've not answered). How is my asking you that question misrepresenting you? That's right: contrary to your glaring falsehood, I am not misrepresenting you...

By your word, "God," here, are you referring to the Father? Yes or No? Thanks, Captain Obvious, for pointing out for us the fact that the phrases, "God the Son" and "God the Holy Spirit," are not found in the Bible, just as we do not find the phrase, "Solomon's grandfather," used in the Bible...

I've numerous times asked you: By your word, "God," are you referring to the Father? Yes or No? Obviously nothing is wrong, or tricky, or illegitimate about this question. Either, by your word, "God," YES, you are referring to the Father, or NO, you are not referring to the Father. You do...

Why do you say that? So, according to you, nobody is justified by faith? If a man was already justified BEFORE he believed, then obviously he is not justified BY believing.

And that's supposed to support Darwinism how, exactly? How is that supposed to agree with the farce called "universal common ancestry"? Wouldn't you kind of need the waters, alone, to bring forth ALL life.....even all the life that Moses tells us the earth brought forth?

But did I say that the Son is not subject to the Father? Did I contradict something in these verses? If so, what? (BTW, hi again, User Name! How've you been? I see you don't have Sting as your icon anymore. (Until this week, I hadn't been on TOL for maybe almost 2 years.))

Do you consider it rational to call a sinner's admission that God saved him/her, "boasting"? Rationally-thinking people don't. Do you consider saying "God saved me" to be the same as saying "I saved myself"? Rationally-thinking people don't. "God saved me" = not boasting "I saved myself" =...

All you're telling us, here, is that Paul distinguishes the Son from the Father/the Father from the Son. No? Thanks, Cap't Obvious. Remember: that the Son is not the Father/the Father is not the Son is a tenet of Trinitarianism. So, what "point" are you trying to make against Trinitarianism...

But no Scripture contradicts what @Right Divider affirmed. The passage you handed us without comment certainly does not contradict what he affirmed; it does not contradict what Trinitarians affirm. You have thus far given zero commentary regarding the "proof" text you handed us. At least you...

"Can God create a rock He cannot lift?" ...is something we all know that fools, professing themselves to be wise, get a perverse kick out of saying. Here's the thing, though: God, because He is omnipotent, can lift any rock, every rock, and all rocks. Thus, every rock is a rock God can lift...

What do you mean by your word, "being"? So, by both instances of your word, "God," here, you are referring to the Father? Is this what you are telling us: "It is completely contradictory to speak of Jesus as being at the right hand of [the Father] and also being [the Father]"? If so, then...

IOW, you have no answer, no rational response to the question I asked you about your reaction to @Right Divider 's post. That's what I've learned by paying attention to what you've written. You've merely handed us a "proof" text without telling us exactly what you imagine you are proving by...

I'm not seeing that you've "burst" any "bubble". What, that @Right Divider affirmed, are you calling a "bubble," and just how, according to your imagination, have you "burst" it? Are you calling the Scripture texts from Isaiah, and from Paul's epistles, that RD has presented, "bubbles," and...

When you say "Jesus isn't God," by your word, "God," are you referring to the Father? Yes or No? If, by your word, "God," you are referring to the Father, then this is what you are telling us: "Jesus isn't [the Father]." Observe that, if you are telling us that the Son, Jesus, is not the...

Like I said, Darwin cheerleaders make that claim: Which is an astoundingly ridiculous thing to claim, since, were it true that the human population on earth was never less than about 10,000, then at no time would the human population have ever been 0. (You know, because 0 < about 10,000...

Thanks again, Sherman! Hello again, my forum friends, @Right Divider, @JudgeRightly, @ok doser, @Clete, and many others. I don't remember just when was the last time I was on TOL, but I think it's been nearly 2 years since. Kind of seems surreal to actually be on here again.

Whenever God-despisers say to Christians, "I don't believe God exists!", one of the following two things is the case: The God-despiser is referring, by the word, "God", to that to which Christians are referring, by the word, "God" (for instance, when we affirm the truth that "In the beginning...

Darwin cheerleaders tell us that humans are reptiles. What's a reptile? According to OED, a reptile is: a vertebrate animal of a class that includes snakes, lizards, crocodiles, turtles, and tortoises. They are distinguished by having a dry scaly skin and typically laying soft-shelled eggs on...