Search results

Oscar the Grouch seems to disagree with you:

Now, am I mistaken in thinking that, according to TULIP theology, some men (Calvinism's "eternally reprobate") are, by God's will, particularly predetermined/foreordained to wrath? Also, could it ever be rational to say that Calvinism's "eternally elect" had ever, in any sense, been by nature...

I wrote that last one specifically with you in mind, doser, knowing you'd get a kick out of it. 😁

Don't mind if I do. Strengths: Skeeter is adept at putting text in a box and clicking on "Post reply". Weaknesses: Not to detract from the glory of his aforementioned "strengths," be it here noted, nevertheless, that Skeeter is, shall we say, shy of using these to any purpose of conveying...

Justified WHEN, though? No one was ever justified before he/she believed the gospel. Remember: Salvation is by grace THROUGH faith, and not BEFORE faith.

Have you defended something? If so, what? What "strengths" have you been projecting in this thread? So, your having written what you've written in this thread is supposed to be thought "proof" for your claim that you "have a capacity for empathy"? It's interesting that you characterize...

It's interesting that he seems hostile and resistant to believing that Darwinists claim what I said they claim, as though he's not on board with them in that claim, yet does not want to think of himself as being at odds with them.

But receiving the free gift of justification has to do with something its recpient did/does: namely, receiving it.

Why? Proof? Why?

For an answer to this question, please actually read the post of mine to which you are reacting, here.

I thought, perhaps, he might have wanted to associate himself with the Muppet Babies cartoon character, "Skeeter," from the 1980s:

It all depends on whether, by your word, "Christians," you are actually referring to Christians, or, instead, are referring to anti-Christians such as @blueboy. Obviously Christians do not believe that anti-Christians such as blueboy and yourself are humble, nor do we believe they/you have...

Here, once again, you're pushing your anti-Bible, anti-Christian heresy of justification BEFORE faith, which is absolutely inimical to the Biblical, Pauline doctrine of justification BY faith. Remember: justified BEFORE faith = justified WITHOUT faith justified WITHOUT faith ≠ justified BY...

Well, you didn't expect him to just come out straightforwardly and call himself, "Bloodsucker," did you? 😏

That's like saying "Why can't more Christians be like anti-Christians?"

There's a big problem here for the heretic, the anti-Trinitarian: You use this extra-Biblical phrase, "has a God," but you have not told us what (if anything) you mean by it. Though you say "the Son has a God," you have not told us what it would be for the Son to "have a God". We, of course...

Why? As @JudgeRightly already judged, rightly, you are glaringly contradicting, by your one statement, your other statement, here: "God is unknowable" VS "We know God". At least, you are doing so so long as, by "God is unknowable," you mean that God is unknowable to us (humans)/that we...

You need to learn how to properly tag me when mentioning me in your posts, @beloved57. I can understand why you want to avoid so doing, but by your failure to properly tag my name, you are preventing me from receiving notification that you are talking about me by name. Thus, I may or may not...

So then, in Genesis 1, you read the word, 'God,' literally? Then who was literally the first human? "In a sense" Adam was what? "Literally the first human"? Let's hear you "prove" your claim that Genesis is dependent in its composition on the document called "The Epic of Gilgamesh"...