Search results

Do you mean something along the lines of that they think Trump may be secretly working with forces which purport, at least, to be working against him?

No it's not. It's not a gift at all. Faith is believing. Believing truth is no more a gift than is drinking coffee or eating an omlet. Now, a cup of coffee may be a gift, and one's ability to drink it may be a gift; but it would be ludicrous and wrong to say that one's drinking a cup of coffee...

"Climate Church" Nice!

...if he is, in the first place, unable to forge or steal them.

By your phrase, "new information," don't you just mean more leftardspeak?

"this"? "they"? Doesn't what "argue against the theory that" what "are kill shots"? So, according to you, one's quitting one's present beliefs would signify that they are based on facts? The fact-based-ness of one's present beliefs should, according to you, cause him/her to quit them?

According to Calvinists, Paul, in Ephesians 2:8, is telling us that the faith by which one is saved is the gift of God. So, when we hear the Calvinist saying that "regeneration precedes faith," it seems we can understand them to be saying "regeneration precedes [the gift of God]," which, of...

LOTS! Oh...."moons", not "morons". @0:47 in the video: "Do you know how many stars are on the U.S. flag?" "Fifty." "Do you know what the stars stand for?" "Earth's moons!"

Debate between whom and whom? What prompts you to choose to call some debate, "rigorous," while choosing to not call other debate, "rigorous"? Consensus?

Boy, you sure do like to shout, don't you? Boy, you sure do like to melt, like snow, don't you?

Of course, so long as you speak in a cognitively meaningless way, you'll have nothing amenable to clarification, and so will have no clarification to provide. It remains to be seen, then, right? I'm sure, in any case, you'll be happy to say something, and then (no matter what, whether rightly...

When you choose to call something "evidence," why do you choose to do so? (We note, preemptively, that it will not help you to react evasively to this question by telling us, "I call it 'evidence' because it is evidence.") What must something do in order for you to choose to call it "evidence"?

Team A's consensus is in claiming the proposition, P, whereas team B's consensus is in claiming the proposition, ~P (which is the contradictory of P). Being a pair of contradictories, one of those, two propositions is true, and the other is false. So, do you want to tell us, then, that team...

Don't worry about it...

Would you say you are qualified to call those whom you choose to call "appropriately qualified experts," "appropriately qualified experts"; or, instead, do you just call them that reflexively, and out of deference to them, because you like what they tell you to think and speak? And, if you are...

THAT cracks me up!

Thanks for the encouragement and for following me, Derf. I'll try not to let you down. :)

That idea makes me wonder, were it true, just what one is then supposed to do with the doctrine of the divine inspiration of the Bible, and the idea of its being uniquely important. To be consistent with the Calvinist's "absolute predestination" way of thinking, should not, say, the Koran be...

Since, by your phrase, "most experts," you're merely referring to interested propagandists for the irrational farce they call "the Big Bang," of course they would say they don't agree with those who criticize their cherished farce. Duh. why should we care that they (and those who, like you...

So he's not talking about what they call "Stellar Evolution Theory"? But didn't you read, in my quotation, where Krauss says, "You couldn’t be here if stars hadn’t exploded, because the elements - the carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, iron, all the things that matter for evolution and for life -...