Search results

No one said they did such on a whim. And I certainly never implied it. One that should have been over about a year ago. Masks DO NOT work on viruses. That you keep pushing the narrative that they do is what's bunk. Lockdowns do more harm than good in preventing the spread of disease...

If you're going to complain about how we run the site, then maybe it's time for you to take a break. If you're going to posture about how you're thinking about leaving, then I'm going to temp ban you until you figure it out. Come back when your ban is up. Or don't. Up to you.

Don't forget sublimation.

How long have you been waiting to use that one? lol

AKA sucking on the government's teat, rather than simply allowing businesses to operate. Unable to work because of the government, forcing them to take such measures where not needed. Because you say so? Seems like it's harmed businesses more than it's helped. How about they simply return...

Defending using a fallacy won't help you, Chair. Go look up "genetic fallacy." It's a fallacy for a reason.

Such businesses supply (through wages) the means of purchasing food, toiletries, and medicine. Ergo, essential to not only the business owners themselves, but also to the people employed by them. But we know you would rather have everyone sucking on the government's teat than earning an honest...

Define "non-essential." I assert that there is no such thing as a "non-essential" business, because it is essential to the owner of the business.

According to your doctrine: Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because their Creator has planned for them to be that way. Because the saved's Creator has planned for them to be able to see it. Because the unregenerate's Creator has planned for them to be that way.

Think "sustained epidemic" because of the lockdowns.

Word games won't get you out of this, chair.

I didn't say that. Don't put words in my mouth. Read what I said again.

Figure it out, Chair. If the epidemic is real partly because of the lockdowns, what does that imply?

Only for tyrannical governments. Otherwise no, they're simply evil. Partly because of the lockdowns.

They have banned it pending more information.

As much as I want to agree, I'm sure that Churchill actually was doing his best for his people... and you can't punish someone for actions their descendants might take.

Do you not care anything at all for those around the world who, as a result of such lockdowns, are experiencing such things? Or are you too focused on yourself to care? That much is obvious. They're more focused on making themselves great at the expense of their citizens. Wasn't that what...

One great benefit of the lockdown is that people cannot get their food from stores, or their medicine in the hospitals. So they save money, lose a lot of weight, but especially.... they don't have to listen to the scientists who are speaking out about how what's being done is hurting people...

Go read the article W2G posted. No, governments are not using actual science to guide their actions, because everything they have done runs CONTRARY to everything that has been learned in the past 200 years of medical progress.

Likewise. No doubt in my mind that I would do that.