Search results

AMEN!

Where in scripture do you read that a lost person CANNOT believe? Paul asks the following assuming that they can if they simply were to hear! How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear...

You clearly do not. It's supposed to say, "The calling is evidence of being in a saved state"? It's supposed to say, "The ones who call on the name of the Lord in a way that pleases God, must already be in a Saved state"? You're reading your beliefs into the text, not discerning your beliefs...

I can almost guarantee that neither B57 nor Nanja will respond to my posts, because there is no defense against what I said without denying what the Bible says, because it would compromise the very foundation of their position.

You say you're not dumb, but yet you say that wearing a mask means that people aren't touching their faces, yet we have video evidence to the contrary. Touching a mask while wearing it only increases the chance of infection...

Callout threads are not allowed on TOL, last I checked. Locked.

Aren't what? Right wing? I would agree with that. They are definitely not right wing ideals, no matter how many times they are called such. Just because you, someone on the left, do not affiliate with or approve of such things does not make them not left wing. Just because you, someone on...

By "far right" Are you referring to fascism, nazi-ism, racism, etc? Because those are leftist ideals, not right wing.

Are you being sarcastic? Or are you really that dumb?

For reference, when Arthur Brain here says "far right," he's using this (wrong) political spectrum: In actuality, the "far right" that he's referring to exists not on the "right," but on the left, as shown by this (correct) political spectrum:

No you don't.

"follow the science" As he constantly touches his mask...

The verse says whoever calls "Shall be saved." It does not say: The calling is evidence of being in a saved state. It does not say: The ones who call on the name of the Lord in a way that pleases God, must already be in a Saved state.

Because you say so? Call, shall be saved. In that order. Or, to put it more bluntly: How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? And how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?And how shall they preach unless they...

No, expo, its not, and even if it was common sense (which isn't common anyways), it would still be wrong. The rights of humans are, in no particular order: Life and Liberty; to Worship; to Free Speech; to Purchase and Use Property; to Purchase, Own, and Carry Individual Defensive Weapons...

No, if that were the case, then it would say "Whoever calls IS saved." But it doesn't say "is." It says "shall be."

May want to try this custom search tool: https://cse.google.com/cse?cx=13446e85c74f76be3 https://kgov.com/search

"Whoever calls shall be saved." It's right there in the scriptures. Why do you ignore it?

Groups are made up of individuals. Individuals have rights, not groups. All men have the same rights. Those rights are inviolable. That means that if someone does or wants something that violates the rights of someone else, they are in the wrong, no matter the circumstances. Those who violate...

Too little too late, I fear.