Search results

Read Acts. Yes, the whole book. Note the three Ananiases (the only three Ananiases in scripture). They are a good indicator of the state of Israel. The first shows the ungratefulness of Israel, as their wait on Christ's return grows longer. The second shows the transfer of attention from...

At Paul's conversion, in Acts 9.

God Himself tells us how an everlasting covenant gets put on hold. The instant I speak concerning a nation and concerning a kingdom, to pluck up, to pull down, and to destroy it,if that nation against whom I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I thought to bring...

A question I always ask those tho try to use that passage to defend calvinism: Did the potter ever finish forming the lump of clay? Or did He remake it before He finished?

There are vessels of wrath and vessels of mercy in the world of the Elect?

This entire post is you cherry picking verses to fit your dogma. I recommend reading the verses in context. You're misreading it, probably intentionally. You keep seeing "us" and automatically skip the "in Him" part. He chose [us in Him]. He did not choose [them not in Him]. He chose a...

That's because you aren't capable of thinking outside your theological box. I'm right on point, and you know it. Answer the question, b57, though I know you cannot, because answering one way puts the blame on God for man's sin, and the other is my position, and there's no other way to answer...

That Israel and the Body of Christ are the same thing. They're not.

You have some pretty crazy ideas running around inside your head...

"The ability to speak does not make you intelligent." - Qui-Gon Jinn (Star Wars The Phantom Menace)

The fact that that seems like it came at you out of left field is because you're so blinded by Calvinism that you can't even follow your own arguments to their full conclusions. YOU, b57, said: So I asked: . . . because YOU say "Christ didn't die for the people who die in their sins." So...

Rabbit trail and evasion! You fully refuse to even acknowledge that the scripture says exactly what it says, and not what you want it to say.

I can clearly see the argument you're trying to make. And I'm telling you, you're wrong, because your position does damage to the rest of scripture.

Your premise is false, therefore your argument is wrong. Christ died for all, to provide a way for all to come for Him. He completely succeeded in that action. Christ predetermined, willed, before the foundation of the world that anyone who would come to Him, after He made a way available...

So it's Christ's fault that they died in their sins?

Rabbit trail and evasion! You fully refuse to even acknowledge that the scripture says exactly what it says, and not what you want it to say. Scripture: My little children, these things I write to you, so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus...

What you are stating is not a fact. What you're stating is an interpretation of scripture that does damage TO scripture.

Stomping your foot and demanding that it is so won't make it so. They are not the same. One is referring to a part of Israel, the other is referring to gentiles.

No, what I asked was: And I explained in post #204, and as Paul explains in Romans 10, preaching the gospel provides the lost the possibility of having hope. Then NO ONE has hope by the gospel, and anyone who preaches it is foolish, because it doesn't do a thing for those who are lost. So...

Not what the verse says. What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, - Romans 9:22 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans9:22&version=NKJV