Search results

Dave, This unresponsiveness on your part is the reason you've driven everyone nearly insane on this thread. Why are you afraid to address the arguments? Do you believe that it is a rationally valid to ignore counter arguments and to simply jump from one refuted argument to the next? Is that...

I picked your post to respond to because you're the one who said "You guys should try to stay on the topic of the thread..." and the proceeded to bring up dispensationalism, of all things. The bottom line is - if your (or someone else's) comments don't have something to do with cosmology, keep...

Stop attempting to hyjack the thread. Discuss the flat earth model or something related to it or go away. No one here wishes to discuss dispensationalism or Mormonism or Preterism on this thread.

I got a good answer to the first of these questions by the way. The reason impact craters are almost always round is because there is sufficient energy in the impact to rapidly melt and even vaporize portions of both the meteor and the impact site. This causes what is essentially a secondary...

Are you being serious? (not sarcasm - really asking)

What would be causing the shadow over exactly half of the Earth in the first place?

I love that this thread seems to have nine lives! Hey Dave, I found a video of a presentation the Wal Thornhill gave a couple of years ago. It seems directly up the ally you wish to be on in regards to reevaluating modern cosmology. Some of it will be too technical but mostly not. If nothing...

Cool! I'll be anxious to see what you think of it. Incidentally, have you ever noticed that the craters on the Moon and elsewhere are almost universally round? Do you suppose that every meteor hit the Moon's surface at or near a 90° angle? Doesn't sound right, does it? Also, why are there so...

Those are not "not natural". They aren't even mutations.

I haven't been following your discussion very closely and am not certain just what you meant here so forgive me if I'm jumping to unfounded conclusions here but, "not natural"? Just what do you think you mean? I don't intend to start a whole discussion on this, I just thought you might want to...

No one is whining but you. I understood your point and responded to it directly, which you missed entirely proving my contention that you could not answer a single argument that I might choose to present in defense of a young earth paradigm. I have built my entire life - my entire life - upon...

Except that there are real rational arguments that can be made in support of that contention that neither you nor anyone else can answer. Don't attempt to highjack the thread on this topic. If you want to debate the age of the Earth, start another thread.

That isn't true. Of course, you concern yourself with what they think. Otherwise, you wouldn't bother with street evangelism (or any other sort of evangelism for that matter). It matters David and you know it. The fact that everyone in the room knows, including yourself, is that the world is...

You're projecting, Dave. You forget somehow that this entire discussion is still here for everyone to read. I've spent the last several months making actual arguments and BEGGING you to do the same. The problem here is that every so called argument you've presented has beendirectly refuted...

David, You've gotta stop with the biblical arguments. At best you're making interpretive arguments anyway which by their very nature do not prove anything. But more important than that is the fact that the Earth IS NOT FLAT and everyone knows it. You're effectively arguing against the veracity...

Dave, Seriously now. I want for you to watch this short video. (The other one I posted if very long and boring but full of good information.) It's just a few minutes long so I want you to watch it. I don't expect it to convince you of anything. I want you to watch it because I want you to see...

Limited, yes but unreliable? The thrust of such an objection is to undermine reason itself. No scientifically minded person would make such an unqualified objection. Instead, they would acknowledge the limitations of our senses and insist that experimental results be confirmed independently...

The Sun is the EXACT same angular size in the sky AT ALL TIMES! It does not change in apparent size at all - period.* Flat Earth debunked. Clete * There is a tiny change in apparent size of the Sun through the year because of the fact that the Earth's orbit is not perfectly circular and we...

I took him off ignore because I was reminded of something I had intended to present as an alternative cosmology that wasn't complete lunatic insanity. He'll be back on it if he doesn't drop this flat earth stupidity.

Because they state that the universe is self-contradictory.