Search results

I wear a mask because I do not miss catching the cold.

Right, so what do you think it means that for basically 1000 years there was just one Church physically, and then for basically 1500 years, every single Christian had a bishop (or a bishop's priest) for a pastor. It's only in the last 1000 years that the Church is physically divided, and it's...

Rights means evolution is wrong.

Some are found defended right in the Decalogue. The rights against being murdered and against perjury. Others are the rights against being kidnapped, and against being raped. But you're right to ask the question, and I myself would love to hash some more of them out. This is all about...

The former isn't accepted as a rights violation by everybody, only basically by those who hold a religious belief about abortion, like Catholics. The latter is a rights violation according to basically everybody. No it's not, it's because we've maintained and defended the liberal institutions...

I agree. So what. We are a republic, and we are made up of people who believe in Christ, and those who don't. So long as we agree that we all have rights, then we can govern ourselves well. Morally.

The acknowledgement that we all have the same rights, and whether they come from God, or from evolution, doesn't make any difference as we govern ourselves as a republic. We do not believe that Catholics or Muslims should be imposing Catholicism or Islam upon everybody else. We agree on this...

1st Corinthians chapter 10, starting at verse 17 for context: 17 For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread. 18 Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar? If you eat of the sacrifices offered...

He created civil government, and He gives us our rights. Liberal governments protect our rights through constitutionalism, separation of powers, and civilian control of the military, the liberal institutions. Since they are all ordered to protecting our God-given rights, the liberal...

No it isn't, it's the same; but it's a choice. I choose to pursue Christ and meaning, others do not, they attempt to pursue happiness in some other way, perhaps as a pagan. We don't have a right to punish, penalize or harass such, with our government, and our government should protect such...

If Adam was obviously highly configured dust, and upon death he would return to more randomly configured dust, rather than highly configured dust, which we are while breathing, that's also self-directed, highly configured dust; then it's disintegration of us that's death, there's the medical...

The scripture evidence points directly at Catholicism, that believes in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, the Lord said, "For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." The Orthodox literally separate themselves from the Church over one...

Sigh. The Samaritans were people who believed in the same God that the Jews did. But they didn't worship God the right way, literally Jesus told the woman at the well this. You all Noncatholics and Nonorthodox are like the Samaritans were. They were basically Gentiles to the Jews, and to...

I agree with defending our Constitution, being a liberal, believing in constitutionalism, along with the separation of powers and civilian control of the military. And not cultivating the liberal institutions of constitutionalism, separation of powers, and civilian control of the military. So...

Those don't conflict with Catholicism. You don't have evidence that confirms your view, nor that conflicts with Catholicism's view. I know that you don't care either way, anonymous on the internet. irl, there might be some reasoning with you, but you're obstinate online.

The people, obviously, but the trick here and in other central American and South American countries, is that the people generate their regimes, they at least tolerate them in not revolting. It's difficult because many of these countries experience what to us would be serious violent crime...

Aaron.

"John 6:63" doesn't negate everything that leads up to that verse in the second part of that chapter. Christ was dealing with people like you, who said basically, in response to Him saying to eat His flesh and to drink His blood, "Really?" to which He said, "Yes, really." They wondered if He...

So you admit it's a circumstantial case. Thanks for playing.

The Bible is not inconsistent with her ever virginality, just so long as the Lord's siblings are the sons and daughters of St. Joseph from a prior marriage, like that he was a widower and had a family from his first wife. It could also be---speculatively---that he was injured in his privates...