Search results

Still a Calvinist bot. :(

Paul was talking about Gentiles, he was using them as a standard, something objective that they could all understand to communicate clearly about. His comment in 1Co5:1 was comparing that particular type of perversion to typical Gentile perversion, and said even the Gentiles don't do that...

Silly rabbit Also confer https://theologyonline.com/threads/tom-brady-5-war-nfl-player.56846/#post-1813450

AMR. I adore Biblical morality, and it is clear.

Did you read the link? Are you familiar with all their observed perversion? All the atheists themselves say the bonobos are unique, that's why they're so commonly used as 'positive examples' of 'sex positivity', and not dogs. But anyway even if dogs and bonobos are alone in that kind of...

And? So what? Why don't all the species act like bonobos then. They are unique. They engage in things that Paul says is "not so much as named among the Gentiles". There must be some reason. And it can't just be something that should affect every other species the same way.

If ever FineLinen does something inconsistent with being a Calvinist bot, I'll try and let you know

FineLinen = Calvinist bot

I was more thinking that they're possessed by demons. Paul calls what the bonobos do unnatural, even though they are an example of nature. So it must be demons.

You 'must' say it? I'm not sure how seriously you take it that words mean things. I think you just proved that you're not to be taken too seriously when you start instructing us about grammar and interpretation. You don't use words as if they mean what they mean, you regularly exaggerate...

You're just a really friendly guy aren't you, It doesn't do any of those things. Yawn!

There is no problem for Catholicism either, as these don't conflict with Catholicism. It's not a point for Dispensationalism if it was already a point for Catholicism. That's just plagiarism. A form of stealing really. Dispenationalism needs to make a new point, not take one of Catholicism's...

Are they all against that which is natural? 1st Corinthians 5:1 seems to have found some bonobos living among the Corinthians.

Answer: Yes Indoor dining in a restaurant definitely has more risk https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/28/health/vaccine-safe-activities-dr-wen-wellness/index.html Other interesting excerpts: (Also you might be fatally allergic to the raincoat. Although I'm not anti-vax or a denier, the odds are...

I am just starting with language itself. What does 'I think' mean? How do we know you're thinking, for instance? What does thinking look like? What can we point to and say, 'This is thinking.' The statue called 'The Thinker' is of a man sitting doing nothing. Is that what thinking is? Is...

Luke 16:16 "The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it." Sounds like the law and the prophets are different from the gospel of the kingdom. Things that differ are not the same.

FineLinen is a Calvinist bot. Ironically.

Yeah, that's not too bad! Of course what you're describing here still exists today, it has persisted throughout all these centuries. Come, to Mass.

I think 'perversion' is a good word here. It is a better translation of the Greek 'porneia'. Paul distinguishes between natural and unnatural perversion (homosexual offense, for example), but he also has another category that is even beyond unnatural, in 1st Corinthians 5:1 But Paul wasn't...