Search results

Yes, and? But if you expect anyone to prove their point before you attempt to prove yours, when it is your thread, the onus is misplaced. I don't understand what you mean. Could you check your sentence structure and try again? But focusing on plural "sabbaths" does not exclude the seventh...

You should first prove your assertion within the context. You certainly haven't done so. Plural "sabbaths" can surely include single ones. Since you made the assertion, you prove your side first.

So you're ok with a rest every, say, Tuesday, right?

I was trying to figure out what it is about making America great that you don't like, but you seem to be be saying "everything". And your only potential champion in the Republican party is so merely because he is anti-MAGA. I can see why you don't want to follow the thought line further. No...

That's what tagging does--it addresses it to you

@annabenedetti What do you think about the Tina Peters business? Trump supports her and has told Colorado to let her out of prison, after she did what state law says to do, to keep from doing what state law says not to do. Should she be released? Was she insane to try to uphold the rule of law?

You mean when someone from our government participated in the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination? That's the rule of law you are looking for? Or when vaccine companies were given carte blanche to test vaccines on our children by force? Sure. There are lots of things that need deconstructing, if...

Sure, that's a bipartisan problem. But if it started crumbling way back then, what do you blame the start of the crumbling on Trump? Are you really saying nothing Trump has done is good? Do you think it's ok for him to help cities clean out pockets of crime, for example? Is DC better for his...

I agree with you. But are you willing to let a transgender, Marxist, math teacher teach your kids math, assuming he/she/it is willing to just teach math?

If you would like to show me that I missed the point by giving the point you were trying to make, I'm open.

I wasn't referring to teaching about politics, but teaching about anything--political beliefs WILL be imparted to one degree or another.

You can't really teach without imparting political beliefs.

Meaning they weren't already starting to crumble? And? Why is this bad? Just as black votes were guaranteed for the Democrats, preached from the pulpits. My dad voted democrat until Bill Clinton, when he voted for Ross Perot. Oh, my dad was a pastor in one of those pulpits. I don't think I...

You think the rule of law and our constitutional government were completely intact before then? So Trump did not start the deconstruction in 2016? I think your pope's view is equally valid if rendered, "Choose the least evil person." Of course, whether he is mad or not, your statement is true...

Not at all. You voted for someone who was incapable of finishing his term and who had somebodies operating with his authority, but without his knowledge. How do you know they weren't mad? Your reason is as follows: See above. How many other madmen have you voted to keep out of office, say...

How do you know? Did you vote for the autopen? You're the one that thinks it's relevant. Just having a definition is inadequate. Please share why it matters when you define it. I looked up the other term, "principle of double effect", and you didn't use it the way it was explained in the...

No, nor very likely to persuade any but those who already favor abortions. I'm not at all clear on why having people on either side of the political spectrum that do something horrendous, not to mention something so opposed to God's moral law, while still in keeping with perverted societal laws...

They should be driving off into that sunset in a Jaguar

@Regulus: just so you understand what I’m saying, you can’t lose your salvation if you still believe those truths about Christ. But Satan is happy when you succumb to temptation, and it is important to keep yourself out of situations you already recognize as weaknesses for you. If pornography...

The difference is that a recognition of free will allows some meaning to their choices, even if it is less logical with the presupposition of exhaustive foreknowledge.