Search results

Since it is true, by believing it is true. All knowledge is belief of true propositions.

We know that, because it's true. We just don't buy your claim that Biden became/is president, because it's false--which is why you and your programmers, the MSM, have never verified it.

But you're a wingnut, so did you expect us to take you seriously when you emitted all that noise? Not only are you a wingnut, but you're downright cross-threaded if you actually believe we do, or would, or could, or should.

What garbage?

Is that supposed to be a question? In any case, it's not a quotation of what I wrote. I wrote "self-righteous sanctimony", not "self righteous sanctimony". What are you doing with all the hyphens you never use when English grammar requires you to use them? You must have a cartel-sized stash...

@Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> @Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> @Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> @Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER>

🤣 The question I asked him is: By answering "No," @Hoping admitted his blatant, self-righteous sanctimony. He clowned himself. But, I can see why you're in awe of his answer, because, unlike you, he at least actually answered a question I asked him. You clowned yourself by expressing your...

It's amusing how you simply inflate your posts with additional, vacuous verbiage when you've already failed to respond rationally to questions about your earlier raving. Now, you've burdened yourself with yet another problem: you have to tell us exactly how verifying the propostion, P, is...

Thanks for the handy template, @Arthur Brain: mediamatters.org?! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Oh, hey man, you carry on... theguardian.com?! :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: Oh, hey man, you carry on... yahoo.com...

The artwork makes it look like it should say "Wii'RE ALL EQUAL..."

What does?:LOL: OK, OK...I know that was low-hanging fruit, but I couldn't resist.

Will you join me in condemning your blatant, self-righteous sanctimony, sinner?

And, I should add, you're obviously a lying, self-righteous sinner, @Hoping.

Exactly how do you "know" when "it's corroborated and verified"? By trusting a "given news source" to tell you "it's corroborated and verified"? It's gobbledegook.

@Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> @Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> Why don't you want to touch these questions, @Arthur Brain?😆

Not "chose", chose. If they did not choose to leave, then they did not leave.

No they don't. Things don't become credible. What's credible is always credible. What's not credible is never credible. See post #243. Try to deal rationally with the old material. So far, you have failed to do so, leaving my questions unanswered, and lying about that fact. For shame. I...

I'd have to make a choice, now, wouldn't I? But what angers your irrationally-thinking mind is that I have pointed out the fact that it all comes down to choosing. I mean, look at that: you're throwing a raging tantrum merely because I pointed out that the Ukrainian people you claim to have...

I did not say they "chose" to flee. I said they chose to flee. They chose to flee. That's just because you're an idiot.

@Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> If you think you can come up with an answer to that question, fill in the blank with your "answer":