Search results

Since Trump never lost any POTUS election, what's there for me to smart from? Nada. You're still smarting from Trump's wins, and from Clinton's and Biden's losses.:ROFLMAO: Whence are you getting your "five and a half years", you retard? You've just told us that: What's supposed to be...

Because it's false that Trump isn't POTUS/CIC anymore; that's why I can't admit that Trump isn't POTUS/CIC anymore. Duh. Since you're incapable of doing the math of subtracting your "the last thee and a half years" from today's date so as to find out when your period of "the last three and a...

What's your "point", stupid? You're the one who says that President Trump was not in the White House throughout the last eleven months of 2020. That's what you are saying when you say that Trump has not been in the White House since 28 January 2020. That's what you are saying when you say...

@Arthur Brain cannot do the arithmetic of subtracting a period of three and a half years from todays date. Noted. @Arthur Brain denies that President Trump was in the White House on January 6, 2021. Noted.

That might be what a diseased mind such as yours would mean by it, but that's not what I mean by it. It's funny how you're trying to cover over your stupidity of not being able to subtract three and a half years from today's date by lying about what I wrote.

No. Of course not, retard. Why would I admit something that's false? I wouldn't.

No. You can't whitewash your stupidity, you hypocrite/retard. You are on record denying President Trump was in the White House throughout eleven months of the year 2020.:ROFLMAO:

Trump hasn't been in the White House since 28 January 2020, you math wiz "with sense"?🤣

No. An uniformitarian. No quotation marks needed.

BTW, whence do you keep coming up with "three and a half years", Professor?

How could I know? Why do you imagine your question is relevant? Who said President Trump has not been in the White House for the last three and a half years? Rationally-thinking people take into consideration the fact that you, @Arthur Brain, are a dyed-in-the-wool uniformitarian, and that as...

See post #363. Bravo. (Despite the fact that "as far as I'm aware" is of especially very, very tiny compass when the "I" is @Arthur Brain.) That an addle-brained, far-left wingnut/pillock such as yourself reflexively calls something "odd" is nothing any rationally-thinking person takes into...

I do not know whether or not he has spent any of that time in the White House. Show me where in the US Constitution it is stated that the POTUS is required to live in the White House.

Wherever he, the CIC of the US armed forces, chooses it/deems it necessary to be, stupid.

In other words, you had no reason to print them at all; printing them was just another mindless act born of your addle-brained, far-left wingnut/pillock mind. Thanks for the clarification. Here, you're still shamelessly trying to change the subject. I asked you about this specific raving of...

The KJP clip at 15:34 exemplifies the sort of shameless stonewalling and lying about it regularly engaged in by far-left wingnuts like @Arthur Brain. Interviewer: "I'm curious if the White House and the president still stand behind his comment that he's never been involved, and has never even...

Why your quotes around "think"? Trump's still president. Why have you just now once again tried to change the subject? You had said: So, I asked you: You have not answered this question. And now, you've just tried to change the subject, vainly hoping to hide your failure to answer it.

@Arthur Brain: <NO ANSWER> So, you were just handing us more of your vacuous verbiage, and not referring to anybody. Got it.

See post #363.

Who says Trump's in the White House?