Search results

That confirms Catholicism.

You either deny Our Lord Jesus Christ is God, or that Our Lady is His mom. No other options: It's here for everybody to see RD. Right out in the open. Public.

Prove it. Like I said, maybe in another thread, it would help if books like 1st Peter were called something like "7th Palestinians" or something like that so we'd know that when Paul writes to the Corinthians, he's writing to a largely Gentile church so when he talks about the New Covenant...

Again, a point not in dispute. Try again? Or fold.

Great. Then show how it's a loaded question. We'll wait. A point not in dispute! lol RD. Plank; eye; remove it. (You won't.)

It's a yes-no question. If you think a logical fallacy is occurring, then point it out. Your false religion is called "anti-Catholicism" or "anti-Catholic bigotry" just so you know fyi.

I'm rubber and you're glue. And you feel as if him "reappearing" in 1st Peter and in Rome (not Palestine) is irrelevant. One point for us both? or how are we keeping score here? I already explained it. The Apostles planted churches, they don't stick around interminably, not even for the...

Like I was saying.

idk why you would just confirm Catholicism like that, but tyvm for conceding RD. :e4e:

No I don't, and I already know what they mean anyway. Let me try this with you: Is Our Lord Jesus Christ God? Is Our Lady the mother of Our Lord? Is Our Lady the mother of God? You won't answer because of the much bigger plank in your own eye which you're ignoring and dismissing while you...

Which links Paul right to John 1:29 "Behold the Lamb of God ... Who takes away the sins of the World." John 3:16 "For God so loved the world" 1st Corinthians 15:3 "Christ died for our sins "

So literally he was telling the Gentiles there (the ethnically non-Palestinians, who you admit were there), c. "You guys don't listen to this; this isn't for you"? Plain. Yes you were. Plain!

Which premise do logic and reason in and of themselves depend on?

Logic depends on something more primitive. That's why I've never found this idea persuasive, logic isn't all the way down, logic isn't metaphysical ground. So therefore it's in the zone of Arian to say Logos means logic.

I think they're all still around, they're just all on another platform somewhere. Leopards don't change their spots. I think it's way easier to avoid them on something like the micro-blog platform over there, because you can curate your tl basically, using that block feature. Here, you can...

You're right. You're the only one in the World who thinks that.

Clete, you call people stupid! That's an ad hominem! Jesus called people actors, and hypocrites, but the closest thing to Him calling someone stupid was when He said if you call someone stupid you're going to Hell! That is a lie, and another ad hominem.

You just said there were Gentiles there. That means non-Palestinian people, ethnically. Peter was not only preaching to ethnic Palestinians that day. You're proving like every single one of my points. The Apostles planted churches, St. James the Just was consecrated bishop of the church in...

Zero uniformity among philosophers rn. I want to know if you feed each firm's A.I. chat-bot generative large language model machine, the whole content-base for philosophers (every philosopher's writings), and tune them appropriately (just not unreasonably), what do they all say? idk how many...

Luke 1:45 ... before John 2 ---- you were right. Luke 1:45 Dispensationalism. Luke 1: 45 "blessed is she who believed that there would be a fulfillment of what was spoken to her from the Lord," that's the first Christian, because Our Lady ... "believed" ... in Jesus ... John 3:16 We use the...