Search results

I've not read this entire thread but what I have read seems to show that those who are arguing against Right Divider are commonly making the mistake of evaluating a biblical system of justice from within the context of our current society. This is a huge mistake and all of the objections having...

What I refuse to acknowledge is the implication that there is some moral responsibility for Adam's sin that we've inherited from him. That is NOT true! By your logic, every baby that's been chopped alive into pieces by the abortionists DESERVED what they got! Worse than that, you believe that...

Hebrews 6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they...

Liar. If you had anything, a whole herd of wild horses couldn't keep you from posting it.

If Ezekiel 18 is the truth then your examples are moot, as is your entire position and argument. No, it would not have been. God DOES NOT execute babies because of Adam's sin! So says God Himself through His profit Ezekiel, not to mention the Apostle Paul (Romans 5). How so? I dare you to...

The phrase "knowledge of good and evil" is not talking about what you know or don't know in your mind. It is a euphemism. It is a reference to the law. For a person to "have no knowledge of good and evil" simply means that the law is not being applied to that person. I will spend ZERO effort...

Irrelevant. There is exactly nothing you can say that even begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete.

No, and even if it were true, it would not to be to any extent that begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete.

Marke is a fool. Ignore anything he says about babies sinning from the moment of their birth. He believes his doctrine, not the bible.

Not true and even if it were, it would not to be to any extent that begins to overcome the fact that the English language has changed to a degree that makes the KJV completely outdated and obsolete. A point, by the way, that you completely ignored and will continue to ignore because if there is...

Always has been!

If you're willing to live with this kind of blatant contradiction and worship a God that does unjust things, whether you give His justice lip service or not, then there isn't any point in discussing this any further with you because you worship a god that you've made up and that does not exist...

Which that debate PROVES to not be the case! And even if it were the case, the fact that the KJV is written in a version of the English language that is four centuries old is sufficient, by itself, to make at least the New King James a superior English translation (i.e. there are likely several...

I didn't say that God wasn't compassionate, slow to anger or merciful. What I said is that God isn't any of those things based on some sort of arbitrary whim at the expense of justice, as your post clearly implied and that you clearly believe. I just reread my post and I don't believe that...

loving and good = righteous

So says you. You haven't the slightest idea what you're even talking about. Read this and learn something! I dare you! Battle Royale XIV

As if you had anything of substance to contribute anyway!

You couldn't persuade anyone of anything! You DO NOT engage the discussion! You do drive by posts that are typically, exactly one sentence long!

Which King James Bible is "the Bible" (capital B), Marke?

Perfect example of your typical post. You take a comment about YOUR lack of engagement and deflect it. I wasn't suggesting that quoting someone was a problem and you knew that when you wrote this stupidity! You're a lazy waste of bandwidth. What in the world you get out of being here, I'll...