Search results

I don't know that that's true, but even were it true, so what? What's your "point"? What's "backfired" on me? I'm not seeing that anything has backfired on me. Not as @Arthur Brain, no, obviously. But what's that supposed to prove? That's what you say. LOL @ you expecting me to believe it...

https://thefederalist.com/2024/05/17/former-nih-director-admits-government-was-top-source-of-covid-misinformation/

But what else do Darwin cheerleaders have if they can't play their go-to "This Darwinstspeak is evidence for that Darwinistspeak!" shtick?

No bubble bursted. Wait...don't you have me on "ignore"?

Did I say you're the person who posts as @Avajs? No. I didn't. But remember, if I will think you are, obviously I don't need permission from you to think so. And, you read my posts, so you already know that the reasons I've given for my suspicion didn't even include the obvious fact of your...

There again, interestingly, your writing is peculiarly similar to a certain habit featured often in @Arthur Brain's writing. Your technically grammatically-incomplete "so..." clause is what caught my eye. Instead of "so it is a bit hard to evaluate", you cut corners by writing "so a bit hard to...

Wait...have you and I talked before? Oh, I know what it is; it's that the way you write, you sound quite a bit like @Arthur Brain. Weird. In fact, so far as I can find using TOL's search feature as best I know how, you're the first person since @Arthur Brain to have used that "sounds about...

In this thread, on 25 April 2024, @Avajs wrote: Hmmm. Where'd you hear that from, @Avajs? It's funny that the day you wrote that post (three weeks ago) happens to have been the same day The Guardian had published the article linked by @Arthur Brain (just yesterday, three weeks later) in reply...

Now, that runs along the border of the mythical, sunken land of Creditcartha, which borders the kingdom of Agartha, right? Didn't they Discover it back during the war, while going under water with debth charges, in the Chase for U-boats?

And, perhaps the most amusing thing is that Dawkins made that inadvertent attack on the professional Darwin cheerleaders' own craft by deliberately mocking and contradicting God's Word at 1 Timothy 6:10: For the love of money is the root of all evil...

https://theologyonline.com/threads/a-moronic-richard-dawkins-saying.48598/post-1716795

As you admit, God also never uses the word "unity" to describe Himself: So, what's your "point"?

If you wish to continue in your failure to defend against my criticism of your choice of the word ('component') you chose, that is fine. Or, rather, truth be told, whether you wish to do so or not, it's inevitable. No one asked, and, true or false, it's irrelevant. When you boil three quarts...

Did anyone say God does not say it was "gathered together unto one place"? No. So, what's your "point"? Even though you have no point in saying that, and your saying it does in no way, shape, or form even put a ding in, or have any relevance to the truth of the Trinity, I will point out the...

That's obviously false, as even you know. You clearly did not repeat what God wrote. Again, what God wrote: the gathering together of the waters called he Seas VS What you wrote: What God wrote is clearly not what you wrote.

Why do you choose to capitalize the initial L of your phrase "the Lord God", and choose to not capitalize the initial L of your phrase "the lord Jesus Christ"? If you had a quarter -- a 25¢ piece -- in each of your hands, would you consider it reasonable to write "I have two quarters; one is...

Did someone say the first day was "a collection of individual days or first days"? No. So, what's your "point"? Did someone say God took a collection of ribs? No. So, what's your "point"? Did someone say Adam was left rib-less? No. So, what's your "point"?

That's false. The gathering together of the waters spoken of in Genesis 1:9-10 is Seas, not one place. 9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so. 10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering...

1) God is the only true God. 2) The Father is God, and thus, 3) the Father is the only true God. 4) The Son is God, and thus, 5) the Son is the only true God. Yet, 6) the Father is not the Son; and 7) the Son is not the Father. 1) [Water] is [the only true water]. 2) [The Pacific Ocean] is...