Search results

Here it is, once again, you lying, anti-Trinitarian, Christ-hating, Satan-serving antichrist -- just as I already provided in post #4489 : a list of two of the questions (printed in red) I've asked you repeatedly, that you've never answered: QUESTION #1 @Ps82: <NO ANSWER, STILL> QUESTION #2...

That sounds nonsensical. What do you even mean by that? Explain to us exactly what it would be for you to "answer [my] questions for someone else". You've posted "replies" to my very posts in which I asked you loud and clear the questions you have failed to answer. So, if you really did not...

Glad you posted it! I don't remember if I have seen it before, but it is really good!

No Trinitarian would stonewall against the questions I've been asking you, and which you still have not answered. Besides, I've wrangled with unitarians -- anti-Trinitarian heretics -- who asininely call themselves "Trinitarian", yet who glaringly advertise that they are not Trinitarian, by...

You: <NO ANSWER, STILL> It's a Yes-or-No question. If you mean you believe only one person is God, then answer Yes. If you do not mean you believe only one person is God, then answer No. You: <NO ANSWER, STILL> It's a Yes-or-No question. If by your word "God", when you say "I believe Jesus...

You wrote: So, I asked you: You responded: So, by your pronoun "him", when you say "are you trying to make him into two or three other persons?" you are referring to both the Father and the Son? If that's what you're doing, then this is what you've just handed us: The Father and the Son are...

I already told you what I don't get about your saying "there is ONE God": You: <NO ANSWER> So, you already knew that I don't get whether or not, by saying "there is ONE God", you mean you believe only one person is God. And, you know that I still do not get whether or not, by saying "there is...

You didn't see a question mark there, sure. But, you saw a statement being made: viz., that Jesus is not the Father. And, you chose to ignore it, rather than to respond either by registering agreement with it, affirming it, or by registering rejection of it, denying it. You chose to say...

Yes. The evasion is definitely apparent! And, if you please, they prefer to be called "personage" rather than "person".😁

By your pronoun "him" to which (if any) of these three Persons are you referring? The Father The Son The Holy Ghost Which one (if any) of the following are you saying? "are you trying to make [the Father] into two or three other persons?" "are you trying to make [the Son] into two or three...

By your phrase, "God incarnate", to which Person are you referring? 1. God the Son or 2. God the Father Which one of those two Persons is the Person you are saying @Clete does not believe the Messiah was? No Christian believes the Messiah was/is God the Father...

Three "ways", eh? You mean, like modes? As in modalism? That kind of ringS a bell(ianism). So, when you say "the Father", you're not referring to a Person, but instead, to a way of working? And, when you say "the Son", you're not referring to a Person, but instead, to a way of working? And...

Do you agree with the truth @JudgeRightly stated, that the Son, Jesus, is not the Father? Is Jesus the Father? Yes or No? Are you saying that someone or something that was not the Father became the Father? That someone or something went from not being the Father to being the Father? Are you...

That's true; sometimes when Trinitarians say "God", we are referring to all three Persons Who are the Trinity. For instance, Moses, when he says, "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..." is referring to all three Persons Who are God the Trinity. Yes, as the Bible...

You wrote: So, I asked you: You: <NO ANSWER> So, it's not just that you can't pronounce whatever words you're complaining about, but they're even too hard for you to write!🤣 You've already had far more than your fair share of audience with me, Avocadope. Enjoy having your "last word", now...

How many? List for us some of the words which you're complaining "are hard to pronounce".

The "I" in "Democrat" is in the "D", and it's really a toothpick stuck holding someone's jaws open in this wise:

That's you telling us that the book you claim you read was written by an irrationally-thinking fool who desires to not be taken seriously by rationally-thinking people. Why do you want us to read it, since you've already told us that Neil is an irrationally-thinking fool who desires to not be...

Would not be a bit surprising!

The claim you put forth, and which you claim is put forth by the book you claim you read -- that fish are ancestors of humans -- is false, and is only an issue for mental-degenerates who believe that fish are ancestors of humans. Are you asking a question? The issue is why you do not believe I...