Search results

  1. 7djengo7

    Do you know Jesus' God?

    @theMadThinker wrote: So, I asked him/her: @theMadThinker: <NO ANSWER> By your cognitively meaningless use of your extra-Biblical phrase "had a God", you have cornered yourself into being incapable of answering the question I asked you about your raving. Apparently you imagined that the next...
  2. 7djengo7

    Do you know Jesus' God?

    What do you mean by your extra-Biblical phrase, "had a God"? Obviously, since the Bible does not say your phrase "has a God", the Bible does not mean anything by your phrase "has a God". And so, it would be madness to say "What does the Bible mean by @theMadThinker's phrase, 'had a God'?" Thus...
  3. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    She couldn't be much worse at reading and writing than you've shown yourself to be.
  4. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    @Avajs: <NO ANSWER> 🤣 Did you ever hear her play Handel on niolin? Please provide evidence for your claim that I have claimed that Darwinists have been on earth for 4.5 billion years, you illiterate retard. You should stop letting her write your posts for you.
  5. 7djengo7

    I Love Jesus and I Accept Evolution

    If it were mock-worthy (and it isn't) to claim Earth's human population went from 0 to 1 in an instant, then it seems that to claim Earth's human population went from 0 to 10,000 in an instant would be at least 10,000x more mock-worthy.
  6. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Is a population individuals? Yes or No? If by your word "populations" you are referring to individuals, then this is what you've handed us in your display of self-defeat: If by your word "populations" you are not referring to individuals, then to what (if anything) are you referring by it?
  7. 7djengo7

    Can man posses a libertarian freewill when his creator, God, does not?

    A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man!
  8. 7djengo7

    Trump News

    What do you mean by "enliven and sustain the universe"?
  9. 7djengo7

    Trump News

    @TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER> @TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER> @TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER>
  10. 7djengo7

    The biggest evidence of the Flood? The world ocean.

    I have no scruple against calling him "Dr.", nor any reason, motivation, or desire to slight his academic attainments and work. But why insist on calling him "Mr. Brown", since, clearly, he is white, not brown?
  11. 7djengo7

    Trump News

    Ah, you were so eager to print a period this time that in your rush to do so you forgot to actually finish writing your sentence before doing so. "...that which is _________"? That which is what? That which is unholy, unrighteous, unjust, evil, murderous, monstrous, etc.? Is it God's will...
  12. 7djengo7

    Trump News

    What a peculiarly inopportune place to have neglected to punctuate with a period. Was "abortion" meant to be the last word of your sentence, or did you just leave off writing, there, in the middle of a longer sentence? Kind of looks wide-open for a continuation, like "...except in cases of X, Y...
  13. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    LOL Thanks for your non-answer, Professor Evolutiondidit! Q. What is Earth's all-time lowest, non-zero human population number? Have fun with your inability and failure to respond rationally to this question! And, while you are failing to answer it, you might enjoy bearing in mind the facts...
  14. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    You don't even know what defining is.
  15. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    In other words, taxonomy is saying things -- affirming propositions (whether true propositions or false propositions). 'Cause that's what you're doing if you're classifying: you're affirming that "A is a B", "X is not a Y", "Dogs have four legs", etc. If you're not affirming one or more...
  16. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Really, when you boil it down, taxonomy is the affirming of one or more propositions -- it is affirming that such-and-such is the case. Wouldn't you agree? To deny that taxonomy is affirming propositions would be to deny that taxonomy is an intellectual, a rational, activity.
  17. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    And, that a population of one is an individual.
  18. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Since animals are individuals, you've just shot yourself down by your admission that "[animals] don't evolve".🤣
  19. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Why do you call taxonomy "darwinspeak"? I, for one, don't call taxonomy "darwinspeak". Your word, "darwinspeak", is not a part of my vocabulary, you eagle-eyed reader. But I call what Darwinists erroneously term "taxonomy", "Darwinistspeak", because it is Darwinistspeak. Says the retard who...
  20. 7djengo7

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    It doesn't mean anything, which fact is what even you have been admitting by mindlessly saying "google it" and "look it up" in reaction to my pointing out that fact. To what (if anything) are you referring by either of your phrases, "ewoks" and "tooth fairy"? As you are not referring to...
Top