Search results

It's Darwinistspeak. It's nothing more than a meaningless noise you're conditioned to make while doing your Darwin-cheerleading shtick. LOL That's you admitting you are incapable of responding rationally to questions asked and statements made about your cognitively meaningless use of your...

I can honestly say that a lot of that stuff is pretty interesting. What many people would be ready to wave off and call "far out" and "impossible". I take it all with a grain of salt, but I'm pretty open-minded to hearing it. I definitely do not think the "Joe Biden" we usually see in media...

I wish so much immoral, disgusting imagery and allusions weren't in the lyrics of Frank's music. I've always really liked a lot of it. So many of the musicians he had in his groups are just top-notch.

Not that you've actually asked a question (since all you did was stick a question mark onto the end of some cognitively meaningless Darwinistspeak); but imagine, had you actually asked a question: what would be your impression of the person whom you asked it if they reacted to it by saying ?

Why? I know that you're not referring to anything by it. What (if anything) do you mean by that? Describe for us exactly what it would be for you to "google it"; of what, say you, would "googl[ing] it" consist, exactly? Are you telling me to just mindlessly type characters into a computer...

Is "hominins" a name of your imaginary friends? Do you think the Ewoks and the Tooth Fairies were wiped out by a comet?

What you wrote, there, reads like a fortune-cookie fortune (except that, unlike you, the Japanese know to capitalize the initial of a sentence in English). Which is kind of apt since a fortune-cookie fortune is, similarly, text that comes out of a dark, empty space inside dough.🥠

Correct. Correct. By your No answers to those questions I asked you, you've just conceded my point, which is the truth that the author of the article is therein denying/contradicting the asinine Darwinistspeak falsehood that the earliest ancestors of humans were single-celled organisms. Make...

The frequency with which news outfits (over)use the word "breaking" in their headlines and announcements nowadays has, I would think, got to be even greater than the frequency with which auto collisions of this sort occur on America's roads.

Wait, you want me to call someone who is not you and ask him if you are he!? Huh!? I think your crayons are melting, Shakespeare.

I asked @Avajs: @Avajs: <NO ANSWER> I asked @Avajs: @Avajs: <NO ANSWER> Your glaring failure to answer these easy, Yes/No questions about the article is you admitting that you have not read the article, @Avajs. And now, you've gone and further admitted that you have not read the article by...

"The authors"? Plural? Seriously? Because the article's author's name is 'Ann Gibbons' instead of 'Ann Gibbon', you think the 's' at the end signifies that multiple authors wrote it? Wow! I suggest you contact Ann Gibbons and ask her if she is multiple authors, and report back.:ROFLMAO:

In the article I linked in the OP, we read: Her skeleton has been described as one of the most important discoveries of the past century, and she is changing basic ideas about how our earliest ancestors looked and moved. Tell us, @Avajs: By the author's phrase, "our earliest ancestors", is she...

It's kind of funny, the phrase "single-celled organism", because, since the cell is the single-celled organism, it seems you could just as well call it a "single-organismed organism".

That's false. By their admission of the truth that the earliest ancestors of humans featured (among other things) arms and legs, they are denying the Darwinist falsehood that the earliest ancestors of humans were single-celled organisms. It matters not a whit that they did not write the phrase...

In Deutschland, wouldn't "4 o'clock" and "beer o'clock" sound and look very similar: "vier uhr" and "bier uhr"? Perhaps towhead Bobby there in the front row is an exchange student from Germany.

Clearly you burned out your last brain cell roughly 300,000 beers ago.

Quote which proposition I stated that you are accusing of being false.

Why do you even bother to post in this thread since you have not even read my OP, and are unable to respond rationally to anything I have written in it?

Now, I had been under an impression that, according to Darwinists, the earliest ancestors of humans were some sort of one-celled, pond-scum animalcules they claim lived billions of years ago. But it has now occurred to me that at least some, professional Darwin-cheerleaders at the Smithsonian...