Search results

So far, you have not answered the questions I have asked you. Maybe you "answer" them inside your head; and indeed, I do not hear what's going on inside your head. But you have not answered them in this thread. And even you know that you have not answered them, which is why you resort to such...

...and never answer them, and then say "I will take your questions," and never answer them, and then say "I will take your questions," and then...♾️

Blame yourself. Calvinism trashes Calvinism by its glaring self-contradiction: God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass, VS yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin... You'll notice...

"Big words"? Like stuff Mr. Big would say?

Imagine one of those crowd-mowing, vehicular-assault terrorists showing up at that scene: "But Officer, what red light!?"

And why did Judas lift up his heel against Christ? Why, clearly out of anger, malcontentment and childish jealousy over the fact that, unlike himself, the other eleven all received middle slices, and he didn't want to eat all that crust!:geek:

How could bread be His body if the "eucharistic element", upon "consecration", stopped being bread and started being His body, instead of bread? The usual Romanist shtick is to deny that the "eucharistic element" is bread once it has been "consecrated" by Rome's "priest", despite the fact that...

I asked you: You: <NO ANSWER> I asked you: You: <NO ANSWER> I asked you: You: <NO ANSWER> One what? One temper tantrum? Obviously you don't got an answer to any of the questions I asked you. By your phrase, "your God", are you referring to God? Yes or No? If No, then to whom or what...

Thank you! See, you get the fact that the Calvinist is, indeed, gotched by those questions! I can't help it if your feelings are hurt by that fact. If I'm not mistaken, you're trying to use your pop phrase "gotcha questions" as though you imagine it has some sort of pejorative power against...

Here are a couple of fun questions I asked a Calvinist: DO YOU SIN? Yes or No? DID "God, from all eternity, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain" YOU TO SIN? Yes or No? Another, perhaps slightly even better question to ask (in light of the phrase...

These are the words He used: "This is my body". Notice He did not say "Bread is my body", and He did not say "This bread is my body". By His pronoun "this" was Jesus referring to His body? Yes or No? If Yes, then Jesus is stating a tautology: "[My body] is my body". Is that what you think...

Yet, Jesus did not even say "This is my [body, blood, soul, and divinity]," did He? According to Paul:And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. Did Jesus mean His blood was "broken for you"? Did Jesus...

What do you mean by that? What do you mean by "make that up"? You fail again. Jesus' body was always Jesus' body: Jesus' body was never bread. To which are you referring by your pronoun "it" when you say "meaning, it is no longer bread": bread OR Jesus' body? According to Paul:And when he had...

@Right Divider states the truth that the RCC belongs to the Devil, and you take that as though he is claiming that Satan has been cast out of the RCC? Seriously? Not one of Rome's "priests"/"exorcists" has ever cast even one, single, solitary demon -- let alone Satan, himself -- out from...

No, He doesn't. According to Paul:And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.Why would you claim that by His near demonstrative pronoun "this" (in "this is my body") He is referring to a morsel of bread...

No, I don't. You're begging the question. Your false claim that Jesus and the Apostles taught what Romanists teach is a Romanist tradition, and was not handed to anyone by Jesus or any of His Apostles. By some people. So what? Also, it is NOT INHERITED. By other people. No, I didn't...

Bloodless heart tissue, or with blood in it? I mean, surely not bloodless, since "the life of the flesh is in the blood" (Leviticus 17:11), and the "consecrated element" is not supposed to be lifeless, right? But, on the other hand, if it's got blood in it, then what's the point of the other of...

Again, why the need to start out with wafers of bread? Why even start out with any sort of foodstuff at all? Why can't your "Eucharistic miracles" convert inedible stuff into food?

In John 6:35, Jesus stated "I am the bread of life". Was Jesus -- the bread of life -- "changed to God"? Why does your "Eucharistic element" even need to be bread in the first place, if Rome's magicians are just going to hocus-pocus it into not being bread anymore? Why couldn't it be, say...