Search results

That's a plurality.

Red light districts and closets protected children. Red light districts and closets.

idk if any of this is right, but it was interesting. https://www.wsj.com/video/series/pro-perfected/why-wind-and-solar-make-grids-more-vulnerable-to-blackouts/36798AC3-98C8-49D4-AA3A-1ECF2E089061

►Can you translate in English please? "Мені боляче. Боляче думати, що Творець дав нам світ у управління, а ми не виправдовуємо його очікувань. Єдине, що мене підбадьорює, це думка про те, що творець, давши нам право вибору, ще в Едемському саду, знав, що станеться. Зрештою, Він Всезнаючий. У...

I say they can. Because otherwise, we can't do anything about them legally. What laws are the diabolic going to obey? None. But stupid people, we can push around with laws, and we should, for their own good, and for ours. It's outta love, for them, and for children, because we don't want...

We should be proud about this: But: "You're proud, of your pride? OK. Go do it in the closet, and keep it to the red light district." It's about the children. It's like their virtue is grass, and wokeness is a lawn mower. We've to absolutely destroy that lawn mower, or, keep it...

He didn't win the popular vote, spoke too soon. Shame, but not a big deal. 49.7% or something like that? Meaning if all the people who lean conservative but who retardedly voted third party, instead voted for him, we would have won the popular vote straight up, but some of his supporters are...

I was a Muslim. And you guys are not as conservative as you think you are. She's half naked, and she's completely beautiful. It'd be different if she were the typical chubby feminist, but she's in great shape, young, and in full bloom, in every way, and she's not wearing enough clothing...

You guys aren't as conservative as you think you are. Wake up.

So you're either blind, or you're a woman. Or, you're a feminist.

You must be blind lol. Too bad.

I asking where is it "claimed by the Romanists that Paul went to Peter in Galatians 2 to "check" that he was teaching correct doctrine."

Post #7 reads "Where?" and it is in response to this portion of the OP: ... It is claimed by the Romanists that Paul went to Peter in Galatians 2 to "check" that he was teaching correct doctrine. ... I'm asking where is that claimed?

She's half naked. I'm not watching that. Hope it was funny.

Just so I know I'm following you. There would be a nomination process (selection process but not an election), and then the confirmation would be made by a randomizer. So long as the nomination process is not democratic in any way, then this would not be a democracy. OK. Now I can read your...

My objection to the OP is post #7

You're right. Is that what he meant? It just said 'selected by the people', which without qualification just means democratic election.

"Judges over tens would be appointed locally, selected by the people under their jurisdiction. These would be the most grassroots-level judges, handling the most immediate disputes." What did you mean by "selected by the people" if not a democratic election?

Post #7

The government maybe, the public assets. Private assets are over 200 trillion USD. The U.S. in total is worth over 200 trillion USD. It means we're like 20-25% leveraged. Not too bad.