Search results

Which party is it who approves of people getting fired for not using "pronouns" again? Which party approves of people being "de-platformed" for not using "pronouns"? Which party "might not want you to have" the right of free speech again?

No, the right to keep and bear arms is in the Constitution because the right is pre-political, and our Constitution is moral and just, merely reflecting the moral reality that we each have a right to defend ourselves, individually, and collectively.

Maybe, maybe not, but the problem Trump is trying to solve is unprecedented, so it calls for unprecedented remedy. As I said, he's abiding by the courts and they're working together on how best to address this problem that his predecessor caused.

This is being hashed out in real time, and President Trump's administration is obeying the courts.

Cable news will be dead in five years. Podcasting is in the process of taking over that space.

President Biden wasn't the acting President for years. We still don't know who was calling the shots, and it's very good news that we got him and his party out of the White House.

The referees of our society under our constitution are the courts, and the Supreme Court in particular. Our courts have not been "captured", especially not by Republicans. An argument could be made that liberal jurists are captured by the Democratic party's ideology, but it would be difficult...

If anybody set aside Jesus and the Father and the Holy Spirit and only focused on Mary, then that would be different, but nobody does that, and if anybody did do that, they wouldn't be good Catholics. Our veneration of Mary is always always always in the context of the Trinity. There's a very...

True, point was that I can press down on the slide all I want and the 1911 will not discharge like that Sig did. What a disaster.

Wow. I have tons of play in the slide of my 1911.

“ Tamura had a suicide note in his pocket ... ” https://lite.cnn.com/2025/07/29/us/nyc-midtown-shooting-shane-tamura-wwk-hnk

No idolatry is greed and covetousness, so says Paul. $$ Eph 5:5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. $$ Col 3:5 Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth...

Whoops. Shoulda listened to the audio first. I thought the guy wouldn't be speaking English since he's ... Norwegian or something. He cussed. Sorry if anybody saw it before I deleted it! (It was Hafthor Bjornsson pulling 505 KGS or 1,113 1/3 LBS in freedom units, equipped, which means in a...

You didn't answer the question: $$ Jas 2:14 What [doth it] profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? "save". Why 'save'? Why is James talking about salvation, about being rescued? What are kingdom believers being rescued from?

$$ Jas 2:17 Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. $$ Jas 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. $$ Jas 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils...

And this is all the Church is saying. And you guys are like, "See?! The Church is anti-Bible!" Because Ted Bundy and Adolf Hitler weren't Christians? Again, I'm just using counterexamples, which refute your argument. This is all I'm doing. If you want to argue those aren't counterexamples...

Nobody even believes that anyway, this could just be an attack on a straw man (or a scarecrow). Counterexamples. Nobody thinks Ted Bundy or Adolf Hitler could possibly have been believers. It's not just because they didn't publicly profess they believed in Christ. There are lots of people...